Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

Jeff Murray
1.7.2026
Gadfly Bites logo
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

News stories featured in Gadfly Bites may require a paid subscription to read in full. Just sayin’.

  1. With school closures and consolidations now set, Cleveland Metropolitan School District students and families have a clearer view of their available options for next school year. Which is a good thing because the district’s school choice portal is now open. Along with all the usual rules and caveats, there are a lot of new wrinkles induced by the closures and Signal Cleveland does its best to explain them in this piece. The district also has navigators available to help and two school fairs coming up before the portal closes on February 27. (Signal Cleveland, 1/2/25)

  2. One of the biggest complications around choosing a school in Cleveland is transportation. Here’s how Signal explained it in the piece above: “If students are forced to move schools [due to closure], they will receive transportation for the next two school years as long as they currently ride the bus to school and choose to attend their assigned welcoming school. Otherwise the standard transportation rules apply.” Clear as tapioca, right? Lest you think that these now-familiar transportation struggles are only an issue in big-city choice-rich areas of the state, here’s a recent survey of nearly 200 district leaders across Ohio, the majority of which report minimal charter and private school choice students. Their concerns—mainly chronic driver shortages—will sound familiar, even with a small-town twang. (Dayton Daily News, 1/6/25) Perhaps a more direct example: Dozens of students in Amherst Exempted Village Schools were delayed getting home yesterday afternoon when a dearth of drivers (a mere 3 people out for “medical reasons” caused all this) required doubling up of routes, and thus kids had to wait in their buildings until a bus became available. The need to transport students to offsite afterschool sports practices in the winter was also cited as a stressor on available staff. It is noted that Amherst will eliminate high school busing (entirely optional in Ohio) and “out-of-season athletic trips” (also optional, no matter what you sporty people say) starting next year due to budget—and other—constraints. (The Chronicle-Telegram, 1/7/26)

Did you know you can have every edition of Gadfly Bites sent directly to your Inbox? Subscribe by clicking here.

Policy Priority:
School Funding
Topics:
Governance
Jeff Murray
1.5.2026
Gadfly Bites logo
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

Today’s edition covers stories from the last weeks of 2025. Regular service for 2026 resumes on Wednesday.

News stories featured in Gadfly Bites may require a paid subscription to read in full. Just sayin’.

  1. East Cleveland City Schools got some huge news right before Christmas: An official end to state oversight via an Academic Distress Commission. And this was no gift either; it was the well-earned culmination of years-long work to boost a swath of academic outcomes for their students. Just how it was supposed to happen. What a great story to lead off our year-end wrap up! (Cleveland.com, 12/24/25) P.S. – If you want to check out Fordham’s take on East Cleveland’s journey to better student outcomes, here’s what Jessica Poiner had to say back in November.

  2. Speaking of a years-long effort, here’s an update on a group of students in one Cleveland Metropolitan School District elementary school who were in fourth grade the year that the Cleveland Promise program was launched. One of the original reporters returned to the school in late 2025, checking in with the students as they were in the midst of their eighth grade year and looking toward high school. Interesting stuff in itself—kids being kids, really—but the most important thing is that the Cleveland Promise was expressly meant to help boost more CMSD students into college with services and support (and yes, a promise of free college tuition when the day came) beginning in elementary school. What’s interesting—and unexpected, I reckon—is that the future plans expressed by most of the eighth graders revisited here don’t seem to require college at all. And certainly not four-year degrees. Even after all that boosting. (Cleveland.com, 12/24/25)
     
  3. This opinion piece—by Susan Tave Zelman and Margaret Erlandson Sorensen—is touted as a New Year’s wish for “bipartisanship” in education reform in Ohio for 2026. But it sounds a lot more like “just do as we say because we say so” one-sided-ship to me. I hope they’re prepared to be disappointed…again. (Cleveland.com, 12/28/25)
     
  4. Meanwhile, Ohio Catholic school leaders from across the state met and talked actual education in December, with some all-star guests including Gov. DeWine and Lt. Gov. Tressel, as well as representatives from the Ohio Department of Education and the University of Notre Dame. (Catholic Times, 12/26/25) There are a few Columbus-centric education updates in Catholic Times’ year-end wrap up—all of them very good news if I do say so myself. These include the fact that the very awesome Cristo Rey High School will be launching a middle school in fall 2026—beginning with sixth graders and adding seventh and eighth grades in succeeding years—and that two new parish-based schools are also being planned. All due to the fact that the diocese’s schools are currently at 90 percent capacity. Hallelujah indeed. (Catholic Times, 12/30/25)

  5. Approximately 45 school districts across Ohio have been flagged as heading for potential fiscal deficits by the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce. Here’s a look at several of those in northeast Ohio, with somewhat lackadaisical attention paid to the reasons why (student enrollment drops) and vigorous attention paid to the cuts that are going to be required for those districts to get out of trouble, regardless of whether these are the actual correct cuts to be making. (Akron Beacon Journal, 12/28/25) It’s bad enough that districts have not been paying attention to the signals they have been receiving for years about the need to right size their budgets. It’s even worse when the data they’ve been getting are erroneous, as has apparently been happening in Barberton City Schools for many months. (Akron Beacon Journal, 12/28/25)

  6. And just to end the 2025 wrap up on the same high note where we began: Here’s another look at the Bio-Med Science Academy’s move to the campus of Kent State University. (Yeah, I know there’s no new information in here, but it’s such good news I had to cover it again.) The independent STEM school will consolidate its K-6 students into one building at a renovated college lab by fall 2027. Until that time, my most fervent wish is that at least one additional STEM school will be announced for somewhere in Ohio. (Akron Beacon Journal, 12/28/25)

Did you know you can have every edition of Gadfly Bites sent directly to your Inbox? Subscribe by clicking here.

Policy Priority:
School Funding
Topics:
Governance
Chester E. Finn, Jr.
1.5.2026
Lou Gerstner
Kenneth C. Zirkel/Wikipedia Commons
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

Another tall education-reform tree fell the other day when Lou Gerstner passed away. The super-chief of IBM and overall business savant also spearheaded a memorable era when corporate tycoons, governors, leading educators—and U.S. presidents—joined together to get stuff done in the K–12 realm.

The product of education-minded parents, a Catholic high school, Dartmouth College, and Harvard Business School, Gerstner was most visible to me as chair of the Achieve board from 1996 to 2002, a remarkable and much missed powerhouse organization in the ed-reform world, ably run by Bob Schwartz, Mike Cohen, and other key players. So I’m recalling mainly the Clinton-into-Bush 43 era, roughly paralleling the late Jim Hunt’s second round as the reform leader of North Carolina and dovetailing the late Rod Paige’s time as Houston superintendent followed by U.S. secretary of education.

Not many trees are growing that tall nowadays, unfortunately, definitely not in the groves we can point to. (Still with us from those older groves, of course, are Bill Clinton, Dick Riley, Lamar Alexander, and others, including Bush, as well as such gubernatorial eminences as Roy Romer and Bob Taft, but they’re no longer in leadership roles.)

My clearest memories of Gerstner commanding the troops is a pair of convenings (under Achieve auspices) in the big and then-grand IBM conference facility on the New York Palisades that pulled together almost all the governors, pretty much the entire reform portion of the country’s education leadership, other major CEOs, and the President of the United States. These were serious gatherings that both diagnosed the current status of K–12 performance and developed strategies for strengthening it. But at least as important as what was said was the pervasive sense that “we gotta work on this together, across sectors, across parties, without regard for our organizational obligations.”

That’s leadership. That was Gerstner in action. But he didn’t stop there. No doubt he was also selling computers, but he launched IBM’s “reinventing education” program (ably led by Stan Litow), and he went on to catalyze and chair an important commission on the teaching profession, while serving on every board you can think of. He also wrote a pretty good book with my friend the late Denis Doyle.

If you query AI about “Lou Gerstner education reform,” the answer comes back under these exactly appropriate headings: national standards; performance-driven system; technology integration; teacher quality; and business leadership in schools.”

Those remain high on my list (along with quality school choice), but a lot of folks aren’t buying things like national standards in our fragmented and more politicized age. So be it. What’s worse is the shortage of commanding reform leaders bent on getting stuff done and ensuring that American kids from all sorts of backgrounds learn a whole lot more. 

Thanks for showing how it can be done, Lou, and may you rest in peace.

Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Topics:
Accountability & Testing
Standards
Teachers & School Leaders

Fordham's 2025 Annual Report looks back on a year of research, commentary, Ohio policy work, and charter school authorizing, with a focus on rebooting the American Dream for the next generation.

The report includes a message from Michael J. Petrilli, a year-in-numbers snapshot, highlights from SCHOOLED and The Education Gadfly Show, and updates on Ohio policy and charter school work.

Download the full report or read it below.


ReBoot

Dear friends,

2025 was an especially challenging year for our country and our schools, but those of us at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute are proud of our efforts, both nationally and in our home state of Ohio, to get education reform back on track.

I'm confident that the country will get through these tough times and that, when we do, rebooting the American Dream for the rising generation will be our foremost domestic mission once again. Schools will play a key role in that effort, as they always have.

Most heartening to me this year was the overwhelmingly positive response to my new Substack newsletter, SCHOOLED. Twice a week, I try to create a live and welcoming forum for the best ideas and most pressing debates in education policy, all with an eye toward rekindling the school reform conversation. The evident willingness of so many policy wonks, practitioners, and policymakers to engage in this discussion is a sign of an appetite for problem-solving and working together.

I'm also proud of our Senior Vice President for Research, Amber Northern, who spent seven months of the year at the U.S. Department of Education, developing a plan to rebuild the Institute of Education Sciences. And I'm especially thrilled to have Amber back!

Please keep reading for an overview of our efforts in research, commentary, Ohio policy, and charter school authorizing in 2025. And thank you for all you do to improve America's schools.

Sincerely,
Michael J. Petrilli
President

Rebooting the American Dream for the rising generation will be our foremost domestic mission once again.

ReViewing the Numbers

A snapshot of the year, at a glance. From ideas to impact, this is what reform looks like in action.

64external radio, podcast, and TV interviews
527blog posts published
49op-eds placed in national and local media
48podcast episodes released
7studies shaping state and national policy debates

Research by the Thomas B. Fordham Institute's Michael Petrilli has demonstrated that red states are now much more active than blue states in adopting new education reform ideas. As a result, red states are leaping out ahead when it comes to student performance.

David Brooks
"America's New Segregation," New York Times

ReFraming the Conversation

Across newsletters, podcasts, Substack, and op-eds, Fordham helped inform national conversations on key education issues in 2025.

SCHOOLED logoSCHOOLED

Michael J. Petrilli's twice-weekly Substack newsletter helped shape the education reform conversation through sharp analysis, curated commentary, and lively debate.

Schooled is so great. No one else could produce something with such rigor and richness and generate this level of feedback and ideas from its audience.

Christine Patterson
Walton Family Foundation

Thanks for Schooled! It sets a new high bar for info, analysis and discussion.

Kalman Hettleman
Former Maryland Secretary of Human Resources

The Education Gadfly Show logoThe Education Gadfly Show

The Education Gadfly Show continued to spotlight the most consequential education policy debates of the year, drawing strong engagement from policymakers and practitioners.

Conversations with leading voices in education policy included: Jim Blew, Rick Hess, Linda Darling-Hammond, Aneesh Sohoni, and Rachel Canter.

Fordham in the News

1,429 media mentions and appearances

If you want to improve schools, you've got to work at the state and local level, because that's where the action is.

Michael J. Petrilli
NPR's All Things Considered

We went through a period in American history when we decided kids did not need phonics, even though the evidence was clear that it is an essential part of learning to read.

Michael J. Petrilli
C-SPAN

Top Commentary

Three good reasons teachers shouldn't D.I.Y. their lessons and shouldn't be asked to

Robert Pondiscio

Governor DeWine is right: Ohio must stop funding "empty desks"

Aaron Churchill

David Brooks is partly right about literary fiction

Meredith Coffey, Ph.D.

Education reform in red versus blue states

Michael J. Petrilli

ReShaping Ohio's Education Landscape

Science of Reading Momentum

Ohio continued full speed ahead on implementation of the science of reading, with additional funding provided in the state budget.

Charter Funding Reform

After years of educating lawmakers on the charter school funding gap, key charter school funding streams were incorporated into the state funding formula in revised code.

Charter School Highlights

  • 10schools
  • 19buildings
  • 4Ohio cities
  • 6,400students

As a charter school authorizer, Fordham provided monitoring, oversight, and technical assistance during the 2024-25 school year.

Students, families, and school community members connected to Fordham's Ohio charter school work

ReSearch and Impact

These studies were among our most viewed national reports in 2025.

"Equitable" Grading Through the Eyes of Teachers

Reforms like "no zeros" and unlimited retakes are intended to increase fairness, but many teachers say they inflate grades and weaken accountability.

Who's on Board? School Boards and Political Representation in an Age of Conflict

As school boards become flashpoints in national culture wars, this study asks whether they truly reflect the communities they serve.

Calculus or Statistics: Does it Matter?

While calculus remains the admissions gold standard, advanced statistics may better prepare students for a data-driven workforce.

The Leaky Pipeline: Assessing the College Outcomes of Ohio's High-Achieving Low-Income Students

High-achieving, low-income students too often fall off the path to selective colleges. This study identifies ways to keep them on track.

ReSearch in Ohio

Five research reports were published in 2025, including two analyses of career and technical education in Ohio.

Ohio's Path to Early Literacy: Science of Reading Progress and Challenges
The Science of Reading in Action: How Toledo's Escuela SMART Academy Is Making Phonics and Content Knowledge Central to Literacy Instruction
Funding Career and Technical Education in Ohio
The State of Career-and-Technical Education in Ohio
Ohio's High School Diploma: Gateway to Success or Door to Nowhere?

ReForm in Action

Events and Engagement

In 2025, Fordham's annual Wonkathon challenged participants to answer:

What needs to happen next, at the state, district, and school levels, for the science of reading revolution to fulfill its promise and ensure that far more children learn to read well?

The response was strong, with record participation and 48 submissions focused on practical solutions, including pieces by David Steiner, Emily Freitag, Robert Pondiscio, Edmund Gordon, and Louisa Moats.

Throughout the year, we hosted high-impact events that brought research and policy into direct conversation:

Does “Equitable” Grading Lower Expectations for Students?

Moderated by New York Times columnist Jessica Grose.

Are School Boards Out of Touch with Their Constituents?

A discussion on representation, governance, and local education politics.

Implementation Is Where It's At: What's Next for the Science of Reading?

A conversation on what it will take to turn reading policy into classroom practice.

Reaching Their Full Potential: Plugging the Leaky Pipeline for High-Achieving, Low-Income Students

More than 1,000 registrants joined the conversation.

Leadership in Policy and Practice

Fordham leaders advanced evidence-based reform by engaging directly with policymakers, researchers, and practitioners.

Amber M. Northern, Senior Vice President for Research, went on sabbatical to re-envision the work of the Institute of Education Sciences.

David Griffith, Director of Research, testified at a U.S. House hearing on charter schools.

Michael J. Petrilli participated in the Alliance for Learning Innovation's Congressional Briefing, A New Blueprint for Education Research and Innovation.

Michael J. Petrilli served as a panelist at The Future of Annual Testing session at the 16th Annual CALDER Conference.

As we return education to the states, it's essential that educators have access to accurate data to inform their work and develop best practices. Dr. Northern's deep expertise in education statistics and years of experience in the classroom will be an asset as we re-envision the work of IES. Our goal is to ensure educators have access to reliable and innovative resources that improve outcomes for all students, and we are excited to have Dr. Northern lead the charge.

U.S. Secretary of Education Linda McMahon
On the appointment of Dr. Amber Northern as Senior Advisor to the Office of the Secretary

ReMembering

In Memoriam: U.S. Secretary of Education Rod Paige

Rod Paige

Roderick Raynor Paige Sr.
June 17, 1933 - December 9, 2025

Rod Paige was a towering figure in American education, a bold reformer, compassionate educator, and steadfast advocate for children who needed opportunity most. As superintendent of Houston's schools, he championed innovation and school choice long before they were widely accepted. As U.S. Secretary of Education, he played a central role in advancing accountability and equity through No Child Left Behind.

Rod later served with distinction on Fordham's board for nearly two decades, where he was a trusted voice of wisdom, skepticism, and encouragement, always asking whether our work would truly help kids and how we would know if it worked.

We honor his leadership, his friendship, and his enduring legacy.

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
Adapted from "Remembering Rod Paige, a great American"

He always wanted to know if something we had in mind would help kids, especially the kids who need help.

ReLiable Partners

A heartfelt thank-you to our 2025 funders and partners. We could not advance our mission without their critical support.

  • Walton Family Foundation
  • Wallace Foundation
  • Barr Foundation
  • Gates Foundation
  • Oak Foundation
  • The Beth and Ravenel Curry Foundation
  • The Kresge Foundation
  • Arnold Ventures
  • The Haslam Foundation
  • Charles and Lynn Schusterman Family Philanthropies
  • The Nord Family Foundation
  • Achelis and Bodman Foundation

ReConnect

National Office

PO Box 110
Burke, VA 22009
202.223.5452

Columbus Office

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202
614.223.1580

Dayton Office

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, OH 45402
937.227.3368

www.fordhaminstitute.org

Full size cover
DOWNLOAD PDF
Jessica Poiner
1.1.2026
2026 predictions blog image
Getty Images/Dmytro Varavin
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

The countdown clock has hit zero, the confetti has fallen, and folks are basking in the shine of a fresh start. Across social media, Ohioans are predicting what they think the new year will bring for them and their loved ones. But what does 2026 have in store for Ohio education? Here are three predictions.

1. Education policy will be a major talking point in the race for governor.

In the fall, Ohioans will head to the polls to elect a new governor. As of this writing, they’ll likely be choosing between Democrat Amy Acton and Republican Vivek Ramaswamy. There are plenty of pressing concerns—like the economy and affordability—that will be debated. But given that one of the candidates (Ramaswamy) has been fairly outspoken about his ideas for schools, it’s likely that education will be a talking point for both campaigns. Two issues, in particular, will take center stage.

First, school funding. If it seems like Ohio lawmakers have been locked in a battle over this issue for years, that’s because they have been. In 2021, they established a new framework that determined the “base cost” of educating an average student and required an additional $2 billion per year to meet its prescriptions. Since then, there have been incessant debates over updating formula inputs, eliminating guarantees, and effectively allocating dollars for low-income students. The state budget that was passed this summer was a mixed bag that didn’t make much progress on solving these issues. With another budget looming in 2027, Ohio’s next governor will need a plan for funding schools, and you can be sure the media will be asking for details.

Second, school choice. This is a bit of a no-brainer, given that Republicans and Democrats disagree sharply on this issue. But the polarization is particularly deep in Ohio, where left-leaning groups regularly blame charters and vouchers for “draining” funds from traditional district schools (untrue), negatively impacting academic outcomes in those schools (also untrue), only helping the rich (again, untrue), and causing pretty much every other problem under the sun. A lawsuit against the state’s largest private school choice program, EdChoice, is currently working its way through the courts. Add in persistent problems like transportation and charter accountability, and school choice is sure to be a featured issue on the campaign trail. 

2. State lawmakers won’t get much done in terms of new policy.

For better or worse, Ohio does the bulk of its education policymaking through the biennial state budget. Off-cycle years are typically used to take stock of wins and losses and gameplan for the next budget. 2026 is poised to follow the same pattern. And even if education advocates wanted to break tradition and get some things done, there are two sizable roadblocks in the way. The first is the governor’s race and various Statehouse elections, which will suck up political oxygen and leave little room for policymaking. The second is a lack of shared vision between the House and Senate, despite both enjoying Republican supermajorities. During the 2025 budget process, the two chambers disagreed on most education issues, including school funding, school choice, and career-technical education. Those disagreements haven’t been resolved in the last few months. That makes passing legislation in the new year highly unlikely—which is a real shame, as both chambers have been working on some promising bills.

3. Local issues will continue to grab headlines.

District-level controversies garnered a lot of media attention in 2025. Two of the state’s largest school systems—Cleveland and Columbus—have been dominating the news lately due to budget cuts and school consolidation efforts. But they’re not the only ones. Districts all over the state made headlines this year for suing the federal government, struggling with transportation, grappling with chronic absenteeism, and lackluster report card ratings. Unfortunately for kids and families, most of these issues haven’t been resolved—and that means they’ll continue making headlines in 2026.

***

And there you have it. 2026 is poised to be a dramatic year, with a race for governor and a lot of local controversies on the horizon. Here’s hoping that, through it all, adults remember to keep the focus on kids.

Policy Priority:
School Funding
Topics:
Governance
Aaron Churchill
12.31.2025
2025 year in review blog image
Getty Images/Bangon Pitipong
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

From college football to movies, everyone loves a good top-ten ranking. In an effort to give the people what they want, here are the ten most notable education stories from the past year in Ohio.

10. County judge slams private school choice. In 2022, a group of school districts filed a lawsuit seeking to wipe out Ohio’s private school scholarship program known as EdChoice. Earlier this summer, Franklin County judge Jaiza Page—an elected Democrat and private school alumna—ignored legal precedent and parental rights in siding with the anti-school-choice plaintiffs. Citing certain appeal, the judge stayed her decision, which meant that 140,000 students, many low-income and minority, did not have their scholarships immediately stripped. Next stop in the lawsuit: the 10th district court of appeals.

9. Graduation rates balloon, pumped up by low standards. This year, the state’s four-year graduation rate reached 88.3 percent, the highest point over the past decade. In three in five districts, rates topped 95 percent. Even underperforming districts such as Akron, Columbus, and Youngstown posted rates above 80 percent. But the dirty little secret behind these sky-high numbers is that thousands of students are graduating through a low-level career-tech alternative that allows them to bypass basic math and reading requirements. That raises the question: How will these barely literate young people fare in the real world?

8. The push for improved charter school funding loses steam. For many years, Ohio severely underfunded its public charter schools. Under Governor DeWine, the funding situation for charters has brightened, thanks largely to a hefty supplement for high performers. This year’s state budget kicked off with the promise of further improvements, as the governor proposed a sizeable increase in charter facility allotments. The gains, unfortunately, did not materialize in the final budget, and the funding gaps faced by charters today remain about the same as in the prior biennium.

7. Ohio moves toward more accurate counts of low-income students. Due to highly inflated “economically disadvantaged” rates resulting from federal policy shifts, Ohio has increasingly misdirected state aid intended to support low-income students. This year, lawmakers took a first step toward fixing the problem. Starting this fall, allotments will be based partly on more accurate counts of low-income pupils who are identified via direct certification. While a good start, lawmakers left some work unfinished. They still need to fully incorporate direct certification rates into the funding formula. They also need to boost the base per-low-income-pupil amount to ensure high-poverty schools are not negatively impacted by this needed shift.

6. Good riddance to the “emergency” levy. With rising home values and citizens sounding alarms about tax bills, state lawmakers took a serious look at property tax policy this year. Ohio’s property tax system is notoriously complex, and one of the most opaque measures has been the “emergency levy.” If a natural disaster knocked down a school building, using that type of language to describe a tax request to citizens would be understandable. But that’s not how the policy was being used. School districts were taking advantage of the charged-up language to get levy requests past voters, not to address legitimate catastrophes. Thankfully, lawmakers repealed the emergency levy through the budget process. Moving forward, districts will be required to put more conventional, neutrally framed tax requests on ballots.

5. Lawmakers put the brakes on Cupp-Patterson. Enacted in 2021 with much fanfare, the Cupp-Patterson model is Ohio’s latest school funding formula. During sunnier times, such as the past couple budget cycles, lawmakers were willing to cover its hefty costs. But going into a leaner budget, it was less clear that lawmakers would continue their embrace. House Speaker Matt Huffman set the tone early by dubbing the formula “unsustainable.” The governor’s proposal was also cool toward the model, as it did not call for an update of the formula inputs, a move which helps the model function but at an enormous cost to the state. In the end, lawmakers retained the general framework but constrained its costs by declining an input update.  

4. Study finds EdChoice increased college attendance and completion. This year, the Urban Institute published findings that Ohio’s private school scholarship students had college enrollment rates 16 percentage points above their public school peers, while their degree completion rates were 8 points higher. The study also found that EdChoice lifted public school students’ college outcomes through competitive effects. Unfortunately, these positive results haven’t stopped the attacks on EdChoice, whose critics seem more focused on money and adult interests than what’s good for Ohio students.

3. Ohio wins a big federal charter school grant. In September, state officials announced that Ohio will receive a $55.5 million competitive grant to support the growth of public charter schools. The funds will be spent over the next five years to expand and replicate quality charters, with a special focus on launching high schools, as well as expanding options in high-poverty communities and rural areas. In addition, Ohio also received $49.2 million to support charter schools’ facility needs. If used well, these funds should unlock exciting new opportunities for Ohio students.

2. Math makes its way onto the state’s policy agenda. Math proficiency has long been a struggle for too many Ohio students, and the pandemic made things even worse. To their credit, state policymakers began taking steps to address the crisis this year. Back in July, the Ohio Department of Education and Workforce unveiled its statewide plan to improve math performance. Then in December, the Ohio Senate unanimously passed math-focused legislation (SB19) that would require the department to identify high-quality math curricula, schools to help low-performing students, and prospective elementary teachers to pass a licensing test before teaching this subject.

1. More Ohio families choose non-district options. My top story of the year—not one covered widely in the mainstream media—is the steadily increasing number of families exercising choice. From 2023–24 to 2024–25, public charter and STEM school enrollments were up by about 2,500 students, good for a 2.2 percent increase. Private school enrollments rose by nearly 8,000 students (+4.6 percent). The number of homeschoolers also increased by about 8,000 students, a 15.0 percent increase (a larger percentage bump given fewer homeschoolers). These data indicate that more Ohio families are finding educational environments that work for their children. In a year with its share of depressing news, that’s reason for cheer.

Happy New Year, and here’s to a great 2026.

Policy Priority:
School Funding
Topics:
Governance
Jeff Murray
12.30.2025
Top blogs of the year blog image
Getty Images/Daniel Tadevosyan
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

Befitting a busy year with so many education topics to cover—including a state budget, a voucher lawsuit, and a full court press to cut down on chronic student absenteeism—Ohio Gadfly readers found a diverse roster of blog posts to pay attention to in 2025.

Here are the top six most-read pieces of the year, in chronological order, neatly telling the story of 2025.

1. Five bold predictions for Ohio education policy in 2025, by Aaron Churchill

Ready to hit the ground running for 2025, readers flocked to our annual prognostication piece starting on New Years Day. Ohio’s K–12 education system would be the envy of the country if all of Aaron’s forward-looking, positive predictions for the year had come true—including those that would boost access to high-quality school choice and solve ongoing transportation woes. Alas, while some progress was made, stakeholders and policymakers have more work to do in future years to bring these to fruition.

 

2. The irrational hysteria over the billion-dollar price tag of Ohio’s private school scholarships, by Aaron Churchill

As a prelude to the budget (and legal) battles ahead, voucher critics across Ohio engaged in sky-is-falling rhetoric early in the year, denouncing not only the cost of Ohio’s private school scholarship programs but also spreading the false notion that wealthy families were disproportionately benefiting from them. Aaron’s well-read analysis concluded with the inescapable fact that “the vast majority of these funds support less advantaged families who rely on scholarships to enroll their child in a private school of their choice,” and that “scholarship spending remains small in comparison to overall public school funding.” Both findings resonated with readers. Unfortunately, his hope for “a calmer, more fact-driven discussion” around the issue as 2025 went on did not come true.

 

3. DeWine’s state budget overhauls Ohio’s absence intervention framework, by Jessica Poiner

Among the many education provisions included in the state budget proposal released by Governor DeWine in early February was a revamp of the way Ohio schools address student absenteeism. Specifically, DeWine wanted to move from a “prescriptive, legalistic, and reactive response to students missing school” toward locally-driven interventions that would anticipate and address specific reasons for student absences. The problem is serious, and readers were eager to see all the possible solutions laid out. Most of them ultimately became law, too, hopefully igniting positive change that will lead to significant declines in chronic absenteeism.

 

4. Governor DeWine is right: Ohio must stop funding “empty desks”, by Aaron Churchill

The governor’s budget also proposed ending fiscal “guarantees,” a longstanding feature of education funding in Ohio that provides excess money to protect districts from reductions that would otherwise be prescribed under the state’s funding formula—especially for districts who are shedding enrollment. At a press conference, DeWine likened that process to paying for “phantom students” who did not really exist, and Ohio Gadfly readers eagerly read Aaron’s analysis supporting this contention. The final budget lamentably walked back the governor’s ambitious proposal in favor of minor adjustments.

 

5. Let’s stop crying “unconstitutional” about Ohio school funding, by Chad L. Aldis

In the midst of the budget debate in April, an old rallying cry arose in the media: Ohio’s school funding system is “unconstitutional.” As Chad Aldis explained in one of our most-read blogs of the year, this is an outdated view. Ohio has enacted four major funding overhauls in the years since the court decisions cited. “The current model is fundamentally different than the one the Ohio Supreme Court found lacking two decades ago,” he wrote. “As the Senate gets to work on its version of the budget, let’s stop pretending we’re still stuck in the DeRolph era. Ohio’s school funding system may not be flawless. But unconstitutional? That dog won’t hunt.”

 

6. Ohio’s state budget yields a mixed bag on education funding, by Aaron Churchill

Finally, readers flocked to our analysis of the final budget bill that went to DeWine’s desk in late June after months of debate in the General Assembly. While only “baby steps” were made toward sunsetting those pesky guarantees, an understanding of the true state of the funding system (and overall economic concerns) did serve to restrain increases overall, with charter school students and EdChoice and Cleveland Scholarship recipients seeing little or no boosts. Aaron’s analysis also examined several marquee non-funding-related provisions, including a continuation of DeWine’s early literacy push, industry-recognized credentialing, and career-connected learning.

*****

As has long been the case in Ohio, substantive education policy often comes about via the biennial state budget process. Stakeholders pay attention to every nuance, debate, and vote, and that was no different this year. We at Fordham are proud to be a go-to resource for analysis, commentary, and research that informs the discussion.

Thank you, as always, for turning to us for your news and information.

Policy Priority:
School Funding
Topics:
Governance
Jeff Murray
12.29.2025
Ohio Gadfly Volume 1 Number 1 blog image
Creative Commons
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

Two decades ago, the Thomas B. Fordham Institute’s Ohio Gadfly newsletter was born—on November 2, 2005 to be exact. Younger sibling of the nationally focused Education Gadfly Weekly, the upstart promised to give Ohio readers the biweekly buzz on “news, analysis, and insight into the education reform effort” in the Buckeye State. That first edition—written, edited, and produced in Fordham’s hometown of Dayton—promised to “play an important role in informing the dialogue and inspiring the debate around pressing issues facing K–12 education” across the state. The Ohio Gadfly has continued that mission uninterrupted ever since.

While we may have lost the old baby pictures over the years (no great loss—likely just a standard, text-heavy email template), we do still have all of Ohio Gadfly’s first words. You can read the full text of Volume 1, Number 1 here.

A couple of observations looking back over twenty years:

The first is how much hasn’t changed with the Gadfly in all that time. Our inaugural edition led off with an editorial piece based on brand new findings from a survey, commissioned by Fordham, of more than 1,000 randomly-selected Ohioans. We’re still partnering on similar types of surveys today to identify what parents and other stakeholders know and care about across a range of education issues.

What were the issues at the top of folks’ minds back in 2005? Spending education funds efficiently, stopping social promotion of underprepared students, providing merit pay for the best teachers, and establishing no-nonsense discipline policies to keep schools safe and class time productive. These topics are still important today. And even though many policy changes have been enacted in the intervening years, there is still more work to do—and Fordham Ohio is at the forefront.

The second observation, though, is that something important has changed…for the better. The Buckeye State’s charter school sector has come a very long way over the last twenty years. The first edition of Ohio Gadfly is full of news clips and comments reflecting the turbulent early days of charters, from mismanaged funds to academic dysfunction.

After years of prodding from Fordham and other quality-minded choice advocates, things began to change with the passage of House Bill 2 in 2015. Two years later, Fordham research showed that the sector was already on the road to redemption. By 2020, the number of charter authorizers had shrunk, dozens of low-performing schools had closed, and student achievement was on the upswing. Around that time, school choice champion Governor Mike DeWine began efforts to incentivize high-performing charters to expand and replicate through a new funding supplement.

Today, Ohio is far beyond those bad old days. School choice is healthy and growing, with more than 110,000 students attending a variety of charters across the state.

As for the Ohio Gadfly, it’s all grown up, too, relocated to the state capital but still bringing Ohioans all the buzz on important education policy issues. Our November 3, 2025 edition, for instance, included new research on Ohio’s graduation requirements, analysis of a promising model for teacher merit pay, and a review of research on postsecondary readiness tests, among other pieces.

We’ll keep writing and hope that you’ll keep reading!

Where are they now? Volume 1, Number 1 writers today.

Terry Ryan departed the Fordham Institute in 2013 to lead Bluum, a nonprofit organization helping Idaho become a national model for how to maximize learning outcomes for children and families. He remains CEO of Bluum today.

Checker Finn transitioned away from his duties as President of the Fordham Institute in 2014 but didn’t stray far. Today he is Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus of the organization, and remains one of our most prolific education gadflies.

Allison Porch became a freelance researcher and business consultant upon leaving Fordham in 2006, before earning her master of library science degree and joining the Carol Stream Public Library system in Illinois in 2015.

Policy Priority:
School Funding
Topics:
Governance
Chad L. Aldis
12.23.2025
If Transparency Matters blog image
Getty Images/Alexey_Arz
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

On December 3, the Ohio Ethics Commission voted to require charter school governing board members to file full financial disclosure statements beginning in 2026. This move, unsurprisingly, has reignited a familiar debate about accountability in public education. Transparency in the use of public dollars is important, and Ohioans rightly expect strong ethical standards from anyone overseeing public institutions. As my Fordham Institute colleague correctly noted in press coverage of the decision, greater transparency for those overseeing public schools is generally a good thing.

But acknowledging the value of transparency does not mean ignoring a clear policy problem: Charter schools are being held to a higher standard than most traditional public school districts. Under Ohio law, only school board members in districts with more than 12,000 students must file financial disclosure statements. That means only board members in a dozen of Ohio’s more than 600 school districts face such a requirement. Yet charter school board members, many of whom are unpaid volunteers or receive only nominal compensation, will now be required to disclose their personal financial information.

If financial disclosure is an essential safeguard for taxpayers, it should be applied consistently across public education. Instead, this directive singles out charter schools based on governance structure rather than the public responsibilities that board members carry.

And in singling out charter schools, the Ethics Commission fails to apply logic consistent with how the legislature has chosen to treat school districts and educational service centers—namely, financial disclosure requirements only should apply to large educational institutions. Moreover, despite their existence for more than two decades, this marks the first time the Commission has applied the law in this manner to charter schools.

This disparate treatment is likely the result of charter schools often being described as “unaccountable.” While that claim doesn’t withstand even modest scrutiny, this is a good opportunity to remind everyone that charter schools are arguably the most accountable entity in Ohio’s public education system.

Let’s start with the basics. They administer the same state tests as district schools, and their academic results are publicly reported in exactly the same way. Their funding model is also more transparent and accountable: Charter schools receive state dollars only for the students they serve. When a student leaves, the funding leaves with them. Unlike districts, charters don’t have state funding guarantees or local property tax levies to buffer enrollment declines.[1]

Beyond the basics, charter schools face consequences that traditional school districts rarely do. Ohio law requires chronically-low-performing charter schools to close. Over the years, dozens of charter schools have been shut down for failing to meet academic or financial standards. District schools that post persistently weak results, by contrast, are almost never closed and often continue operating indefinitely.

Charter schools are also overseen by independent sponsors—state-approved entities responsible for monitoring academic performance, financial health, and legal compliance. Sponsors, like districts, have the power to intervene or close schools that are not meeting expectations. But unlike districts, sponsors themselves are evaluated by the state based on the outcomes of the schools they oversee and can lose their authority if they fail to hold schools to high standards. This gives them a clear incentive to act that does not exist in the district system.

None of this is an argument against transparency or accountability. In fact, it would be hard to find any entity in Ohio that has done more to strengthen charter school accountability than Fordham. While reasonable disclosure requirements can strengthen public trust, accountability policies should be grounded in fairness and consistency. Singling out charter school board members for broader disclosure—while exempting most district school boards—reinforces the mistaken perception that charter schools operate outside the public system or beyond oversight.

Charter schools are public schools. They educate Ohio children, use public funds, and are subject to stringent academic and financial accountability. Policymakers and regulators should stop looking for new ways to hold charter schools to standards that go above and beyond those applied to school districts. If Ohio believes stronger ethics disclosure rules are warranted, then the conversation should be about applying them evenhandedly across all public school governing bodies.

True accountability is not about imposing different rules on different types of public schools. It is about setting clear, consistent expectations—and holding everyone to them.


[1] Ten charter schools will receive a total of $3.2M in guarantee funding this year based as they fell below FY 21 per-pupil funding levels. This funding is not tied to or a shield from enrollment losses.

Policy Priority:
Standards & Accountability
Topics:
Governance
Jeff Murray
12.22.2025
Gadfly Bites logo
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

News stories featured in Gadfly Bites may require a paid subscription to read in full. Just sayin’.

  1. There was a bit of paradox in the findings of the state’s audit of reading curricula used in Ohio teacher preparation programs which we didn’t talk about last week: Some of the institutions that were not in compliance with state laws actually met most or all of the 73 metrics on which they were being adjudicated. That is, they included everything they were supposed to to comply with science of reading best practices, but also failed to exclude one or more of the low-quality pedagogical practices specifically banned by state law. (You know the ones I’m talking about.) Hence the failing grade. Editors at the Toledo Blade are all in for all of it, even though local flagships University of Toledo and Bowling Green State University were on the list of those institutions that failed. The editors are confident those schools will purge the bad stuff (or have already done so) and that doing so is as imperative as incorporating all the proven methods to help students learn to read. A very succinct way of eliminating the questions around the paradox. (Toledo Blade, 12/21/25)

  2. Meanwhile, on the topic of reasons we should remain a little wary, here’s a look at Mad River Local Schools in the Dayton area. They have, teachers and administrators say, made great progress in boosting the percentage of third graders that are at or above grade level in their reading ability. And provide data to back themselves up. But, while they claim that they’ve been doing this work for 10 years—“far before the state’s mandated changes”—those data seem to me to show that it's only since the start of Gov. DeWine’s comprehensive push to make science of reading the law of the land (see above) that substantive improvement was really recorded in Mad River. Given that reality, I’m not sure why it was necessary for anyone involved in this piece to claim (or to publish on the record) that the district’s efforts pre-dated state mandates. Feels like everyone could take proper credit for whatever improvements have occurred without that caveat, thus it makes me wary that someone insisted it needed to be there. (Dayton Daily News, 12/20/25)

  3. Fittingly for the final edition of Bites for the year, here’s a look at the life and work of current Kettering Mayor Peggy Lehner, who will retire from a lifetime of public service on December 31. This included two stints in the Ohio Senate and one in the Ohio House of Representatives. As Senate Education Chair, she was known for her deep knowledge of K-12 policy and willingness to roll up her sleeves and tackle the toughest issues. This is probably best exemplified by her tireless leadership championing successful charter school reform, by which we mean House Bill 2, enacted in 2015 and still powering important changes in the sector today. Farewell and best wishes for retirement to an exemplary public servant. (Dayton Daily News, 12/19/25)

Did you know you can have every edition of Gadfly Bites sent directly to your Inbox? Subscribe by clicking here.

Policy Priority:
School Funding
Topics:
Governance

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 63
  • Page 64
  • Page 65
  • Page 66
  • Current page 67
  • Page 68
  • Page 69
  • Page 70
  • Page 71
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]