Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Evidence-Based Learning

Displaying 781-810 of 837 results
Commentary
1.29.2020
Evidence-Based Learning, Teachers & School Leaders

The endless, rocky path to reading science

Chester E. Finn, Jr.

The National Council on Teacher Quality just released its third review of America’s elementary teacher prep programs, seeking to determine, among other things, whether ed schools provide adequate instruction in scientifically-based reading instruction. The first investigation of this question, back in 2013, resulted in most programs receiving D’s and F’s, and just 35 percent earning A’s and B’s. But this year, slightly more than half of traditional prep programs received honors grades. That’s progress. But there are still miles to go.

Commentary
1.29.2020
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction

Using screen-time to boost children’s science and engineering knowledge

Brandon L. Wright

Children’s screen-time is an important issue.

Commentary
1.22.2020
Evidence-Based Learning

What American education could buy with a larger investment in research and development

Michael J. Petrilli

For R & D to work in education, we must consistently secure funding from governments and philanthropies. That means presenting them with realistic, sensible ideas that can be adopted and implemented at a reasonable cost—both in money and teachers’ time. Fordham and CAP’s Moonshot for Kids competition yielded proposals for several such tools.

Commentary
1.22.2020
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction

Reader’s workshop: The science denial curriculum

Robert Pondiscio

I owe my education career to reader’s workshop, the Teachers College Reading and Writing Project, and its founder Lucy Calkins. I started as a mid-career switcher with a two-year commitment to teach fifth grade in a South Bronx public school. Two things about my school are worth knowing: It was the lowest-performing school in New York City’s lowest-performing district.

Commentary
1.17.2020
Evidence-Based Learning, School Finance, Curriculum & Instruction, Governance, Personalized Learning

The top 10 EconTalk episodes on education

Adam Tyner, Ph.D.

A few years ago, as I was wrapping up grad school (where my dissertation was about migrant workers in China, of all things), I came across a bunch of fascinating podcast episodes about education policy and school reform.

Commentary
1.14.2020
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

Why don’t evidence-based practices take hold in schools?

Jeremy Noonan

Education Week’s recent report, Getting Reading Right, found that the most popular reading curricula in the country are not aligned with settled reading science.

Commentary
1.8.2020
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Governance, Teachers & School Leaders

Where R & D and school improvement meet, good things happen

Michael J. Petrilli

Fordham’s recent Moonshot for Kids competition, a collaboration with the Center for American Progress, highlighted the distinction between research and development and “school improvement.” They’re very different concepts. R & D is inherently top-down and school improvement mostly bottom-up. Yet bringing them into productive contact with one another is vital and might be the key to getting student outcomes moving in the right direction once again.

Commentary
1.7.2020
Evidence-Based Learning

Why evidence-based practices don’t work: Part II

John A. Dues

There’s a large gap between the current state of education sector R & D and our aspirations for this research. As sectors, education and medicine have lots in common and analogies are often drawn between the disciplines. However, when it comes to evidence-based practices, there are stark differences between the two fields.

Commentary
1.6.2020
Evidence-Based Learning

Why evidence-based practices don’t work: Part I

John A. Dues

To be clear, I am in favor of building a strong education R & D sector. However, it’s important to acknowledge the serious shortcomings of the current system. It is because of this current state that I am arguing that evidence-based practices don’t work. I’m making two claims.

Commentary
12.11.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Charter Schools

The coming KIPP referendum

Robert Pondiscio

Hard as it may be to believe, the Knowledge is Power Program, better known as KIPP, is now older than a lot of the people who teach in its schools.

Podcast
11.26.2019
Evidence-Based Learning

The Education Gadfly Show: The obstacles of evidence-based practices

On this week’s podcast, Kim Marshall, author of The Best of the Marshall Memo, joins Mike Petrilli and David Griffith to talk about

Commentary
11.21.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Charter Schools, Curriculum & Instruction

Social capital and schools’ opportunity equation

Bruno V. Manno

The words “American Dream” are shorthand for describing an individual’s pathway to opportunity and a successful life. Historically, K–12 schools provide young people with the foundational knowledge and skills they need for achieving success and the American Dream.

Podcast
11.20.2019
Evidence-Based Learning

The Education Gadfly Show: Are screens to blame for NAEP’s bottom falling out?

On this week’s podcast, Sarah Sparks, a reporter and data journalist for Education Week, joins Mike Petrilli and David Griffith to

Commentary
11.13.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Governance, Teachers & School Leaders

All 2019 Wonkathon submissions are in. Here’s what the wonks proposed.

Tran Le

The past decade’s shift to significantly higher academic standards and more rigorous assessments means that many more students are now far below grade-level expectations. In recent months and years, there’s been much debate about how best to help such students catch up.

Commentary
11.13.2019
Accountability & Testing, Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

How magnet programs can promote diversity and turn around failing schools

Pedro Enamorado

What can be done to rescue failing schools?

Commentary
11.13.2019
Accountability & Testing, Evidence-Based Learning

The underwhelming effects of stereotype threat on standardized tests

Adam Tyner, Ph.D.

Stereotype threat is when people inadvertently conform to negative stereotypes about a group they are in, for example their race or gender. A recent meta-analysis on the effects of stereotype threat has important implications for equity in the education system, the validity of standardized tests, and for teacher preparation.

Commentary
11.12.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Governance, Teachers & School Leaders

Driving learning for all students: A framework for Multi-Tiered Systems of Support

Bonnie Hain, Laura Slover

In our work with schools at CenterPoint, we often are asked to help design or support the implementation of research-based, high quality curriculum. Almost invariably, discussions with school leaders turn to the connections among and between the core curriculum and the tiered supports for students who are off grade level and struggling to advance.

Commentary
11.12.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

Closing student achievement gaps requires both rigorous grade-level work and personalized learning

Britt Neuhaus

National data indicate that approximately three of every five students begin the school year below grade level, with those numbers even higher for low-income students and students of color.

Commentary
11.11.2019
Accountability & Testing, Evidence-Based Learning, Charter Schools, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

2019 WONKATHON RUNNER-UP: Teachers and curricula aren’t enough for below-grade-level students. They also require scalable strategies tailored to their needs.

Jessica Varevice

Editor’s note: This was the second-place submission, out of nineteen, to Fordham’s 2019 Wonkathon, in which we asked participants to answer the question: “What’s the best way to help students who are several grade levels behind?”

Commentary
11.11.2019
Accountability & Testing, Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

Fostering teacher quality and expertise is the best way to help students who are several grade levels behind

Candice McQueen

Research and our personal experience tell us that the single most important factor affecting student achievement is the quality of the teacher in the classroom. No technology, tool, or other seemingly magic program can help students who are several grade levels behind get back on track and ultimately thrive.

Commentary
11.8.2019
Accountability & Testing, Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Governance, Teachers & School Leaders

To ensure success for all students, state assessment makers must be learners, too

In the last two decades, since states began implementing standardized testing under No Child Left Behind, there has been much debate about the value of those assessments. In Louisiana, where I serve as an Assistant Superintendent, we know measurement of student learning is critical, and tests hold the power to define the academic bar for all students.

Commentary
11.8.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

If we want to accelerate student learning, we need to redesign the school day

David Liben, Meredith Liben

Historically, literacy instruction in the United States privileges the privileged. It starts in the earliest grades, when less systematic approaches favored in many early literacy curricula privilege students who arrive at school more comfortable with language and books.

Commentary
11.7.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

Engaging families, early and often, is the best way to help students who are several grade levels behind

Vidya Sundaram, Elisabeth O’Bryon

During this past summer, Family Engagement Lab facilitated a gathering of parents to discuss parent-teacher partnerships at their elementary school. During the discussion, the group moderator pulled us aside to let us know that a parent was there because her child had been retained a grade and she did not know why.

Commentary
11.6.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

Staying on the shelf: Why rigorous new curricula aren’t being used

David Steiner

I want that quiet rapture again. I want to feel the same powerful, nameless urge that I used to feel when I turned to my books.

Commentary
11.6.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Teachers & School Leaders

The relationship between racial discipline and achievement gaps

Tran Le

A new study published in AERA Open investigates whether and to what extent racial discipline gaps are associated with racial achievement gaps in grades three through eight in school districts across the U.S. It also examines if these relationships persist after accounting for differences across districts.

Podcast
11.6.2019
Accountability & Testing, Evidence-Based Learning, Standards

The Education Gadfly Show: NAEP 2019: It (was) the economy, stupid

On this week’s podcast, Marty West, a Harvard professor of education, joins Mike Petrilli and David Griffith to talk about last week’s NAEP results and their relationship to the Great Recession. On the Research Minute, Amber Northern examines how graduation requirements affect arrest rates.

Commentary
11.6.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

From Play-doh to Plato: All students need to grapple with grade-level text

Harriett Janetos

My thirty-plus years in teaching have taken me on an unplanned path from Plato to Play-doh. When I taught Advanced Placement English to seniors three decades ago, I would have confidently bet against finding myself twenty-five years later teaching kindergarteners how to read.

Commentary
11.6.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

Tailored paths that can combine pre-, on-, and post-grade skills are the solution for students below grade level in math

Joel Rose

Standards are written to reflect the instructional path that students should follow throughout their educational journey. In math, that includes concepts such as basic algebraic thinking in the early elementary grades, multiplying fractions in the fifth grade, working with ratios and rates in the sixth grade, and so forth. Let’s call this the “standard instructional path.”

Commentary
11.5.2019
Accountability & Testing, Evidence-Based Learning, Charter Schools, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

Rigor or personalized learning? Just ask Dr. Seuss.

Jessica Shopoff

What’s the best way to help students who are several grade levels behind?

Commentary
11.4.2019
Evidence-Based Learning, Curriculum & Instruction, Teachers & School Leaders

2019 WONKATHON THIRD-PLACE ENTRY: Follow schools’ leads to embrace personalized learning and academic rigor

Gwen Baker, Lauren Schwartze, Bonnie O'Keefe

Editor’s note: This was the third-place submission, out of nineteen, to Fordham’s 2019 Wonkathon, in which we asked participants to answer the question: “What’s the best way to help students who are several grade levels behind?”

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 20
  • Page 21
  • Page 22
  • Page 23
  • Page 24
  • Page 25
  • Page 26
  • Current page 27
  • Page 28
  • Next page Next ›
  • Last page Last »

Type

  • Book (1)
  • Commentary (814)
  • Event (1)
  • Podcast (9)
  • Report (4)

Topics

  • Accountability & Testing (504)
  • Advanced Education (267)
  • Career & Technical Education (84)
  • Charter Schools (1117)
  • Curriculum & Instruction (1594)
  • ESSA (129)
  • (-) Evidence-Based Learning (837)
  • Facilities (25)
  • Governance (1416)
  • Personalized Learning (51)
  • Private School Choice (140)
  • School Finance (169)
  • Standards (190)
  • Teachers & School Leaders (1456)

Date

  • 2026 (89)
  • 2025 (124)
  • 2024 (161)
  • 2023 (129)
  • 2022 (138)
  • 2021 (111)
  • 2020 (37)
  • 2019 (47)
  • 2007 (1)
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]