Next Generation Science Standards Revisited
Can you spell “C” as in “chemistry”?
Can you spell “C” as in “chemistry”?
Triangulating a trifecta of survey results
Thirteen months ago, I wrote about the hostility charter-school athletic teams faced across the nation as they sought an equal opportunity to compete against their peers.
The exchanges stemming from Mike Petrilli's recent op-ed and concerns about school-grading systems appear to reflect some confusion about poverty, performance, proficiency, and growth. Much of the prevailing discourse seems more focused on finding someone (or something
This is the first post by Michael Brickman, Fordham’s new national policy director. Until last week he was Governor Scott Walker’s education policy advisor. Follow him on Twitter at @BrickM or email him at [email protected].
Today we kept both promises by issuing a pair of additional analyses related to NGSS.
Among the shortcomings of the NGSS is its acute dearth of math content, even in situations where math is essential to the study and proper understanding of the science that students are being asked to master. Also problematic is the alignment of NGSS math with the Common Core State Standards for mathematics. Appendix L of the NGSS seeks to explain the alignment and apply math more thoroughly to NGSS science. This commentary by Johns Hopkins mathematician appraises that appendix. Download Commentary on Appendix L: Alignment of the Next Generation Science Standards with the Common Core State Standards for Mathematics to read the appraisal.
With states weighing whether to adopt the Next Generation Science Standards (NGSS), a new analysis from the Thomas B. Fordham Institute compares the existing science standards of thirty-eight states with the NGSS and with exemplary standards from three other states. (The thirty-eight are those states with standards that are either “clearly inferior” to the NGSS or “too close to call,” based on our Final Evaluation of the Next Generation Science Standards and The State of Science Standards 2012.)
Mike Petrilli has valid reasons for wanting to abandon proficiency—but not reason enough, at least so long as it matters greatly in the real world
Student growth is the true measure of school effectiveness
Andy Smarick interviews Emily Barton, assistant commissioner for curriculum and instruction at the Tennessee Department of Education
Andy Smarick interviews Neerav Kingsland, CEO of New Schools for New Orleans
What Samuelson called “a prolonged squeeze” from retirement commitments to public employees, we called “the big squeeze” from retirement costs of teachers
Shout it from the rooftops, tell all your friends: The Common Core era signals a return of history, civics, literature, science, and the fine arts to the elementary school curriculum
A first look at today's education news: The A-F school-grading system is under scrutiny, there should be more debate over whether to "mainstream" special-ed students, and more
Mike, a strong supporter of standards-based reform and accountability in education, makes the case for an accountability opt-out for some schools
Growing numbers of parents, educators, and school administrators are calling for a local "opt-out" from state tests and accountability systems. Is this opt-out a cop-out? Or would students benefit from a system that their own teachers and principals devised? Should all schools be offered an opt-out alternative, one in which they propose to be held accountable to a different set of measures? What about opt-outs for high-achieving schools or schools with good reason to be different? Would such a system move us toward or away from the goals of the Common Core? As for charter schools, must they continue to be tethered to uniform statewide accountability systems? Or should we rekindle the concept of customizing each school's charter and performance expectations?
A first look at today's education news: Tony Bennett to resign as Florida state superintendent after "grading-gate," Congress passes the student-loan compromise easily, and more
Andy Smarick interviews Derrell Bradford, executive director of Better Education for Kids
I don’t know what really went on inside the Indiana Department of Education—and neither do you
In its modern form, MOE simply can’t do what its advocates say it will do—i.e., maintain a consistent level of state and local investment in education
A recap of our recent event, cohosted by DFER, on "new" accountability systems
A first look at today's education news: The Senate reaches and approves a compromise on student-loan interest rates, a study finds that the well being of immigrant students varies greatly by economic status, and more
Paternalism has been a hallmark of Progressive reform movements for over one hundred years, and today’s school-reform movement is no different
Education is no longer the exception to the rule
Repeat after me: The Common Core sky is not falling
A first look at today's education news: Behavior-modification programs are under scrutiny, states can now compare the prices of PARCC- and Smarter Balanced-developed Common Core tests, and more
Yesterday, PARCC released the cost of its tests—and right on cue, another state, Georgia, dropped out of the testing consortia