Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
      • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
    • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • High Achievers
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
    • Events
  • Scholars Program
High Expectations

Discipline Reform through the Eyes of Teachers

David GriffithAdam Tyner, Ph.D.
7.30.2019
7.30.2019

The debate over school discipline reform is one of the most polarized in all of education. Advocates for reform believe that suspensions are racially biased and put students in a “school-to-prison pipeline.” Opponents worry that softer discipline approaches will make classrooms unruly, impeding efforts to help all students learn and narrow achievement gaps.

To determine how practitioners see this complex issue, we partnered with the RAND Corporation to survey a nationally representative sample of more than 1,200 teachers in grades three through twelve. And because racial and socioeconomic equity is a key consideration in the discipline debate, we oversampled African American teachers and teachers in high-poverty schools to ensure that their views were represented—something not attempted in any prior discipline survey.

Discipline Reform through the Eyes of Teachers, co-authored by Fordham Institute researchers David Griffith and Adam Tyner, yielded five findings:

  1. Teachers in high-poverty schools report higher rates of verbal disrespect, physical fighting, and assault—and most say a disorderly or unsafe environment makes learning difficult.
  2. Most teachers say discipline is inconsistent or inadequate and that the recent decline in suspensions is at least partly explained by a higher tolerance for misbehavior or increased underreporting.
  3. Although many teachers see value in newer disciplinary approaches—such as Positive Behavioral Interventions and Supports (PBIS) and restorative justice—most also say that suspensions can be useful and appropriate in some circumstances.
  4. Most teachers say the majority of students suffer because of a few chronically disruptive peers—some of whom should not be in a general education setting.
  5. Despite the likely costs for students who misbehave—and their belief that discipline is racially biased—many African American teachers say suspensions, expulsions, and other forms of “exclusionary discipline” should be used more often.

These findings are the basis for four recommendations:

  1. Federal and state policy should “do no harm” when it comes to school discipline.
  2. Local school districts should give teachers and principals greater discretion when it comes to suspensions.
  3. Advocates for potentially disruptive students should focus on improving the environments to which they are likely to be removed, including “in-school suspension” and “alternative learning centers.”
  4. Additional resources should be used to hire more mental health professionals and teaching assistants in high-poverty schools—not to train teachers in unproven “alternatives to suspension” that may do more harm than good.

In short, we need to address the disciplinary challenges schools are facing—and accept that they may take more time and money to overcome—instead of saddling them with yet another unfunded mandate.


Check out our report's complementary site: teachersondiscipline.com

Link to teachersondiscipline.com.


Click here to download a ZIP file of our report's figures.
 


Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Topics:
Accountability & Testing
Governance
Teachers & School Leaders
DOWNLOAD PDF

David Griffith is Associate Director of Research at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, where he manages or authors reports on various subjects including charter schools, …

View Full Bio

Adam Tyner is national research director at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, where he develops, executes, and manages new research projects. Prior to joining Fordham, Dr. Tyner served as senior quantitative analyst at Hanover Research, where he executed data analysis projects and worked with school districts and other education stakeholders to…

View Full Bio

Report Materials

NYC-Specific Survey Results

7.30.2019

Discipline Reform PowerPoint - All Figures

7.30.2019

Foreword & Executive Summary

7.30.2019

Related Resources

view
High Expectations

The Academic and Behavioral Consequences of Discipline Policy Reform

Matthew P. Steinberg, Johanna Lacoe 12.5.2017
NationalReport
view

How to think about discipline disparities

Michael J. Petrilli 12.8.2017
NationalFlypaper
view

The debate on school discipline reform

Anthony Nguyen 2.9.2018
NationalFlypaper
Fordham Logo

© 2020 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1015 18th St NW, Suite 902 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • <
Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]