Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
      • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
    • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • High Achievers
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
    • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

How much do teachers matter in the early grades?

William Rost
6.9.2022
Getty Images/monkeybusinessimages

A recent CALDER study examines the effects that earlier-grade teachers have on students’ eighth-grade math outcomes by analyzing Washington State administrative data.

The researchers followed nine cohorts of children who started fourth grade between the 2006–07 and 2014–2015 school years. The study focused on students whose data contained their third-grade standardized math test achievement, who could be tracked through eighth grade, who had background data including variables such as learning disability status and free-and-reduced-price-lunch eligibility, and who could be matched with one math teacher in each grade and school year of their education. With these constraints, the sample contained 173,858 students and 15,981 teachers.

Using a value-added model, the researchers ran two analyses. First, they measured the impact a student’s fourth-grade teacher has on their eighth-grade math achievement—and how that impact compares to that of their eighth-grade teacher. And second, they measured the impact on eighth-grade math achievement of replacing teachers in grades four through eight—so also grades five, six, and seven—whose effectiveness is above the 95th percentile or below the 5th percentile with teachers of median effectiveness. How much, in other words, does losing the best teachers reduce achievement? And how much does removing the worst teachers improve it?

There were three noteworthy findings. First, fourth-grade teachers do impact their former students’ eighth-grade math scores, but not as much as those students’ eighth-grade teachers—0.16 standard deviations versus 0.36. Second, replacing the worst-performing 5 percent of teachers in grades four through eight with median performing teachers raises overall students’ eighth-grade math scores by a whopping 2.5 standard deviations (mirroring past research on the topic). Third, both retaining good fourth- and eighth- grade teachers and replacing bad ones had positive impacts on eight-grade math achievement—but the magnitude of those impacts depended on the grade. Retaining a fourth-grade teacher above the 95th percentile of the value-added distribution, instead of replacing her with one of median effectiveness, had a larger impact on increasing later math achievement, 0.46 standard deviations, than replacing a teacher below the 5th percentile, 0.30 standard deviations. But in eighth grade, the results were opposite, with the replacement of ineffective teachers causing more impact than retaining the good—0.97 versus 0.57 standard deviations.

The policy implications are clear: Teachers matter—and their impacts, be they good or bad, last for years. Leaders should therefore strive to gauge teacher effectiveness in reliable ways, then strive to retain the best teachers and remove the worst. All of that is, of course, easier said than done. But when successful, the efforts would likely bear fruit.

SOURCE: Dan Goldhaber, Zeyu Jin, and Richard Startz “How Much Do Early Teachers Matter?,” National Center for Analysis of Longitudinal Data in Education Research (2022).

Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Topics:
Evidence-Based Learning
Curriculum & Instruction
Teachers & School Leaders

William (Will) Rost is a development associate with the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Before coming to Fordham, he taught Social Studies at a D.C. middle school for six years. In the spring of 2021, he completed his master's degree in education policy at George Washington University. His research interests include social-emotional learning, education inequities, and teacher shortages.

Sign Up to Receive Fordham Updates

We'll send you quality research, commentary, analysis, and news on the education issues you care about.
Thank you for signing up!
Please check your email to confirm the subscription.

Related Content

view
Ohio charter news logo
School Choice

Ohio Charter News Weekly – 2.3.23

Chad L. Aldis, Jeff Murray 2.3.2023
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Gadfly Bites logo
School Funding

Gadfly Bites 2/3/23—The good, the bad, and the obvious of voucher expansion

Jeff Murray 2.3.2023
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
High Expectations

How much education is a public responsibility?

Chester E. Finn, Jr. 2.2.2023
NationalFlypaper
Fordham Logo

© 2020 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1015 18th St NW, Suite 902 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • <
Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]