Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
      • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
    • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • High Achievers
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
    • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Effectively implementing social-emotional learning means getting the terminology right

William Rost Jeremy Smith
11.12.2021
Getty Images/peshkov

Two charter networks, Uplift Education and Distinctive Schools, have provided models for supporting social-emotional learning (SEL) that other schools should emulate. As a recent report from Fordham illustrates, parents want schools to teach SEL, although they might have different ideas about what to call it. There has also been growing concern about students’ mental health needs during the pandemic. In response, Uplift and Distinctive, which both serve predominantly low-income and minority student populations, took a schoolwide, strategic, and student-centered approach to SEL.

Uplift surveyed students on their well-being during the first week of school last year. They found the biggest concerns from students across their twenty-one campuses were Covid-19 and family stress, and that students were struggling with virtual school and missing their friends and teachers. In response, they created the “Uplift 5,” which consisted of a warm greeting, emotional check-in, movement break, mindful minute, and optimistic closure, and asked teachers to use it every day. Uplift also used survey data to identify students who might need extra support. Unlike most public schools, Uplift employs dedicated mental health professionals at its schools to meet these students’ needs.

While Uplift created their social-emotional learning curriculum in-house, Distinctive Schools obtained much of theirs from an outside company, Move This World, which uses interactive videos, skills assessments, and surveys to encourage students’ social-emotional growth and monitor their progress. Every middle school student in the Distinctive network also has a weekly, fifteen-minute meeting with an adult mentor, and every Distinctive school integrates SEL data into their quarterly dashboard meetings.

The strongest link between these two programs is their commitment to making social-emotional learning a systemwide effort. For these charter organizations, SEL stretches beyond individual classrooms to encompass the entire organization. For example, these charters have hired administrative staff whose jobs revolve around the implementation of SEL, have strategically leveraged data on an organizational level to focus these efforts where they are needed most, and have even invested in their teachers’ SEL. As these schools have taken an organizational approach to implementation, it is important that the members of the organization have a shared commitment to SEL, and one way these charters accomplished that was through shared terminology.

Indeed, one finding from the Fordham survey was the importance of the using the right words to describe this sort of education. For example, parents ranked the term “social-emotional learning” second to last out of a list of alternative titles for initiatives of that nature. Fordham’s Adam Tyner, the lead researcher for the report, parlayed these results into a greater lesson for those seeking to implement SEL in school districts and charter networks: They should keep the importance of language in mind.

This and its relationship to buy-in among stakeholders was not lost on Distinctive Schools and Uplift Education, who both developed a shared understanding and their own definitions of social-emotional learning. This helped them align their values and the goals they hoped to accomplish with their SEL initiatives. Likewise, this shared terminology helped buy-in among teachers and parents.

Though minor changes to terminology may seem trivial to some, the Fordham survey has shown that language can have a tremendous impact on attitudes toward social-emotional learning. Uplift Education and Distinctive Schools demonstrate how SEL can be implemented effectively when efforts extend beyond the classroom and become school-wide and organizational. When all stakeholders are involved, SEL transforms from what can be seen as an add-on to schooling to a useful and valuable subject in its own right. But a necessary component of doing so is getting everyone in the network onboard and using the same terminology.

Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Topics:
Curriculum & Instruction
Governance
Teachers & School Leaders

William (Will) Rost is a development associate with the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. Before coming to Fordham, he taught Social Studies at a D.C. middle school for six years. In the spring of 2021, he completed his master's degree in education policy at George Washington University. His research interests include social-emotional learning, education inequities, and teacher shortages.

Jeremy Smith is a research assistant with the Thomas B. Fordham Institute. A Virginia native, Jeremy holds a bachelor’s degree in physics from Hamilton College and a master’s degree in physics teaching from the University of Virginia. He is currently working toward a master’s degree in education policy at American University. Prior to joining Fordham, Jeremy worked as a high school teacher, university instructor, and…

View Full Bio

Sign Up to Receive Fordham Updates

We'll send you quality research, commentary, analysis, and news on the education issues you care about.
Thank you for signing up!
Please check your email to confirm the subscription.

Related Content

view
Reconstituting the state board of education blog image
School Funding

The case for restructuring Ohio’s state board of education, and how to do it

Aaron Churchill 8.19.2022
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Ohio charter news logo
School Choice

Ohio Charter News Weekly – 8.19.22

Chad L. Aldis, Jeff Murray 8.19.2022
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
High Expectations

Instructional coherence isn’t a trendy reform. It’s necessary—and it works.

Kunjan Narechania 8.19.2022
NationalFlypaper
Fordham Logo

© 2020 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1016 16th St NW, 8th Floor 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • <
Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]