Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Gadfly Podcast
      • Flypaper Blog
      • Events
    • Covid-19
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
    • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • High Achievers
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
    • Events
  • COVID-19
  • Scholars Program
High Expectations

The Supplemental Curriculum Bazaar: Is What's Online Any Good?

Morgan PolikoffJennifer Dean
Foreword by:
Amber M. Northern, Ph.D.
Michael J. Petrilli
12.10.2019
12.10.2019

Nearly all teachers today report using the Internet to obtain instructional materials, and many of them do so quite often. And while several organizations now offer impartial reviews of full curriculum products, very little is known about the content and quality of supplemental instructional materials.

The Supplemental-Curriculum Bazaar: Is What's Online Any Good?, authored by University of Southern California associate professor Morgan Polikoff and educational consultant Jennifer Dean, explores a simple question: Are the supplemental materials teachers download on popular websites high quality?

The study focuses on lesson plans and related materials for high school English language arts, an area where teachers are especially likely to supplement their core curricular resources, and examines over three hundred of the most downloaded materials across three of the most popular supplemental websites:

  • Teachers Pay Teachers
  • ReadWriteThink
  • Share My Lesson

It addresses two main sets of questions:

  • What types of materials are teachers downloading most frequently? What kinds of content do they include?
  • How do experts rate the quality of these materials? What are their strengths and weaknesses? And what is the relationship (if any) between how experts view the quality of the materials and how teachers using them do?

Among the nine findings, our reviewers determine that the quality of the texts referenced in the materials are generally good, but clarity and instructional guidance for teachers are weak, and many resources fail to align to the academic standards to which they claim alignment.

Overall, reviewers rate most of the materials as “mediocre” or “probably not worth using.”

These sobering findings reveal a major mismatch between what content experts think educators should (and shouldn’t) use in classrooms and what teachers, hungry for instructional resources, are choosing to download. We don’t claim that the priorities of both groups should be the same. Still, to help teachers make more informed decisions, supplemental platforms should consider making expert reviews available, in addition to any teacher ratings and popularity rankings they currently offer.

—

Responses to the report from the materials providers appear in the report materials section below.


Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Topics:
Curriculum & Instruction
Teachers & School Leaders
DOWNLOAD PDF

Morgan Polikoff is an Associate Professor at the Rossier School of Education at USC.

Jennifer Dean

Report Materials

Foreword & Executive Summary

12.10.2019

Responses to the report from the materials provider: Teachers Pay Teachers

12.10.2019

Responses to the report from the materials provider: American Federation of Teachers ShareMyLesson

12.10.2019

Related Resources

view
High Expectations

Why we reviewers are wary about the popular online curriculum resources teachers are downloading

Jennifer Dean, Jenni Aberli, Sarah Baughman, Bryan Drost, Joey Hawkins 12.13.2019
NationalFlypaper
view
High Expectations

The Right Tool for the Job: Improving Reading and Writing in the Classroom

Melody Arabo, Jonathan S. Budd, Shannon Garrison, Tabitha Pacheco 3.14.2017
NationalReport
view

Dear teachers, most of the popular lessons you found online aren't worth using

Amber M. Northern, Ph.D., Michael J. Petrilli 12.11.2019
NationalFlypaper
Fordham Logo

© 2020 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1016 16th St NW, 8th Floor 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • <
Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]