Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
      • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
    • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • High Achievers
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
    • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Secretary Cardona asked states to “raise the bar.” New York responded by lowering it.

Dale Chu
3.30.2023
Getty Images/lavendertime

This school year was supposed to mark the beginning of the comeback. Largely free from pandemic-related disruptions and with coffers flush with Uncle Sam’s Covid cash, states could finally turn their attention toward clawing back what students have lost. But early signs are, at best, mixed about how these efforts are progressing: Almost a quarter-million children across twenty-one states are missing entirely from schools, to say nothing of the half-million children in Los Angeles who missed out on classes last week. Tutoring has not been the answer thus far, and many in positions of power seem to have lost interest in school outcomes and results-based accountability.

To the extent that our education debates still turn on school improvement, U.S. Secretary of Education Miguel Cardona says he wants states to keep their focus on academic achievement. In a platitude-heavy speech given earlier this year, the nation’s top education official called on policymakers and educators to challenge the current state of affairs:

Today, we raise the bar in education. The same is not good enough anymore. If we do what we’ve done, we’re going to get what we’ve gotten. We’re better than that. Our children deserve better than that. The first area where we must raise the bar is academic excellence. As much as it is about recovery, it’s also about setting higher standards for academic success in reading and mathematics...

To do this, states need valid, reliable, and rigorous assessments. Cardona went on to say that standardized tests should serve as “a flashlight on what works and what needs our attention.”

Tell that to the folks in New York State, who have decided it’s better to hide the evidence. Its education department recently announced a plan to effectively lower the bar required for students to achieve proficiency on state reading and math tests, unironically referring to the diminished threshold as the “new normal.” This in a state where kids lost enormous ground, and where things are probably worse than reported due to the large number of students who did not sit for the state exams.

To reach the baseline required to be considered proficient, a scoring committee that reports to the New York Board of Regents determines the material that students must know, and then sorts it based on the level of difficulty. The committee then uses a combination of technical considerations and expert judgment to decide the minimum scores required for a particular level of achievement. The setting of these “cut scores” happens largely out of the public eye, which is why, in part, this process can be vulnerable to mischief. Indeed, many states have historically misled the public about whether students are actually proficient.

Over the last twenty years, the federal government has been examining the discrepancy between how proficiency is defined on the National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) as compared to each state’s definition. What they used to find is that most state standards for reading and math map to NAEP’s “basic” achievement level rather than to “proficient.” Over time, however, most states have made progress in being more honest about how they report student performance by raising their cut scores—to the point that some state tests now have standards at NAEP’s “proficient” level. New York is not one of them.

No, in fact, in the Empire State, some have reasoned that state reading and math tests should be re-normed so that students can pass them at lower levels because of their learning loss. It’s a colorable if head-scratching argument, coming at a time when Cardona and others have repeatedly said that getting back to normal is not good enough. Making matters worse, New York is no stranger to exam manipulation. This under-the-hood tinkering is happening in a state with a long anti-testing streak, and within a politically fraught environment that has become increasingly skeptical, even hostile, to standardized tests.

Part of the problem—one that is largely unacknowledged, at least publicly—is that we’re really lousy at “catching kids up” en masse if they’ve fallen significantly behind. Consequently, to solve for low proficiency rates, the path of least resistance is to make exams easier to pass—creating a false impression of success, much as already happens with high school graduation rates. If New York’s lower cut scores lead to more students being deemed proficient, the state can both mask the detrimental hardships wrought by the pandemic while claiming that it effectively deployed its federal relief dollars to raise reading and math scores back up to snuff. What’s more, it makes a mockery of the communication gap between schools and parents if the state tells them their kids are caught up when they’re really not.

This will be a dynamic worth watching: the degree to which states are being honest in how they’re succeeding (or failing) at addressing pandemic-era learning gaps. On the one hand, how states define proficiency matters less in the long run than focusing on how pupil achievement rises relative to where it presently is. But the last thing states should do is to be anything less than forthright with parents and families about how their children are doing. It’s shameful that New York is attempting to blind its citizens to the gaps and shortfalls besetting its students, but if history and experience are dependable guides, more states could soon follow this ugly example.

Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Topics:
Accountability & Testing
Governance

Dale Chu is currently an independent consultant on education programs and policy. His experience includes senior positions at the Indiana and Florida Departments of Education. During his service in Indiana, Dale helped to develop and implement all of the state’s key education reform initiatives ranging from educator effectiveness and school/district accountability to collective bargaining and school choice.

Dale’s…

View Full Bio

Related Content

view
Ohio charter news logo
School Choice

Ohio Charter News Weekly – 5.26.23

Jeff Murray 5.26.2023
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Gadfly Bites logo
School Funding

Gadfly Bites 5/26/23—Closures

Jeff Murray 5.26.2023
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Update on tutoring blog image
Standards & Accountability

Ohio’s high-dosage tutoring efforts are a well-kept secret. That’s not a compliment.

Jessica Poiner 5.25.2023
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
Fordham Logo

© 2020 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1015 18th St NW, Suite 902 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • <
Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]