Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Gadfly Podcast
      • Flypaper Blog
      • Events
    • Covid-19
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
    • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • High Achievers
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
    • Events
  • COVID-19
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Cautious hope for a new history-and-civics roadmap

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
3.4.2021
Getty Images/YayaErnst

Bullish but far from sanguine is how I view the ambitious history-and-civics “roadmap” unveiled this week by the “Educating for American Democracy” (EAD) project.

I welcomed the venture when it launched two years ago, have advised it via several of its committees and feedback sessions, have done a bit of back-room prodding and editing, and have encouraged my Fordham Institute colleagues to sign on as an institutional backer. One hopeful sign is the large number of such backers and endorsers and the wide range of views and priorities they represent. Another encouraging example of the project’s wide appeal is the supportive editorial in the Wall Street Journal by six former U.S. education secretaries, three from each party.

The backdrop to my own (and Fordham’s) support is the appalling state of history and civics education in today’s United States. Our own team is nearing completion of a comprehensive review of state standards for K–12 schooling in those two subjects. While I can’t divulge any specifics, I can say with certainty that many states have bungled it via standards with thin-to-nonexistent content, huge gaps, and such a mishmash of formats that it’s nearly impossible to picture teachers and curriculum developers actually following them.

Perhaps as revealed by the slipshod expectations for student learning signaled by their motley standards (albeit with some stellar exceptions), states mostly don’t seem to care whether kids learn this stuff. Though most retain the obligatory high school U.S. history course, and a fair number have a required course (often just a single semester) in civics or U.S. government, rare is the state where schools’ success in imparting this vitally important knowledge, skills, and dispositions to their pupils figures in the their accountability plan. Often there are no statewide assessments or other outcome measures, and when there are, they seldom count. (Okay, yes, students must pass the required courses, but that’s teacher judgment.)

Maybe it wouldn’t matter so much if adult Americans were well versed in their country’s history, governing principles, system of government, and civic institutions—and if they took that knowledge to heart and acted in accord with it. But—I don’t really need to write this sentence!—we have ample evidence, accumulating by the day and week, and faster with every passing month, that that just isn’t so. Unless you haven’t looked at any sort of screen or newspaper in the past few years, you’re well acquainted with this meltdown and the havoc it is wreaking on so much that so many have long cherished about the United States.

Schools alone can’t solve that problem, but what kids learn there can contribute to a much-needed solution. So the EAD team heroically undertook to develop a “roadmap” by which schools (and districts, states, etc.) can reinvigorate history and civics education.

Predictably, this was hard, as much of what divides Americans has its counterpart in K–12 social studies. “Action civics” versus “how a bill becomes a law.” Skills versus knowledge. “1619” versus “1776.” “Wars, presidents, and other great men” versus “the history of the oppressed and victimized.” I could go on.

The EAD team strove to enlist a wide range of participants as they sought a middle ground. They also finessed the toughest questions by posing their entire new “roadmap” as a series of questions that kids should wrestle with and be able to answer rather than trying to prescribe answers to those questions. The questions are really good—and eighteen-year-olds who possess informed and thoughtful answers to them will be well prepared for citizenship in the American democracy. But the roadmap is a long way from an actual curriculum.

That’s left to states, districts, schools, and teachers. Thus the hard work that lies ahead. The EAD team also had to finesse some of the stickiest “who does what” questions. They avoided telling states to build history and civics into formal accountability structures for schools or students. They avoided prescribing the many enormous changes that will have to occur in teacher preparation. They sketched a very limited role for the federal government, though one that may bring its own culture wars as, for example, NAEP frameworks for assessing these subjects get revised and one that could metastasize in worrisome ways if some of EAD’s friends on Capitol Hill get their way.

So there’s no dreaded “national curriculum” here, at least not yet, and that avoids a lot of problems for the time being. But neither is there a curriculum here (!), much less an energy source to push and coordinate all the moving parts that need to move together. Documents like this are, of necessity, predicated on so many individuals, organizations, and institutions changing their present practices. Perhaps most worrying, the changes sought by EAD cannot happen at scale without a skilled and well-educated teaching force that is dedicated to breadth and balance, equipped with a rich and robust curriculum, and capable of delivering it. The EAD team knows this, but nothing within their power will cause a seamless silken duvet to replace today’s patchwork quilt. So this elegant roadmap and its many supporting documents and supporters become, inevitably, something of an aspirational exercise that starts a conversation, even as we know that getting K–12 education back into the business of citizen-making is a long-term enterprise. EAD supplies plenty of thoughtful advice to all concerned, yet today our K–12 system is ill-equipped to deliver on all those things.

That’s why my admiration and bullishness for what the EAD team has achieved must be tempered by my shaky confidence that it will make the difference that American education needs.

Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Topics:
Curriculum & Instruction
Teachers & School Leaders

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Senior Fellow at Stanford's Hoover Institution.

Finn served as Fordham’s President from 1997 to 2014, after many earlier roles in education, academe and government. From 1999 until 2002, he was John M.…

View Full Bio

Sign Up to Receive Fordham Updates

We'll send you quality research, commentary, analysis, and news on the education issues you care about.
Thank you for signing up!
Please check your email to confirm the subscription.

Related Content

view
Gadfly Bites
School Funding

Gadfly Bites 5/16/22—Wiggle room indeed

Jeff Murray 5.16.2022
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Quality Choices

When it comes to the Charter Schools Program, little details can have big impacts

Christy Wolfe 5.13.2022
NationalFlypaper
view
Ohio charter news logo
School Choice

Ohio Charter News Weekly – 5.13.22

Chad L. Aldis, Jeff Murray 5.13.2022
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
Fordham Logo

© 2020 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1016 16th St NW, 8th Floor 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • <
Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]