Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

A school choice zealot’s case for neighborhood schools

Andy Smarick
4.9.2026
Kids boarding a school bus
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

I’m a longtime zealot for school choice. I think students, families, schools, and communities benefit when we have a variety of education options and parents get to match their kids to learning environments.

But that doesn’t mean the longstanding America system of residentially assigned public schools has nothing going for it. In fact, I think choice advocates have hurt their own cause by failing to appreciate the virtues of neighborhood schools. Always, but especially in this era of alienation and polarization, we need to take advantage of the institutions that connect us to others—and traditional public schools are one of those institutions.

There are two types of “community,” and both are valuable.

School choice prioritizes the voluntary understanding of community. This has particular resonance in America because of our enormous diversity and our unusual capacity for forming groups without government direction. School choice is built on the conviction that families can have very different preferences and that those differences deserve respect. This is made possible by the fact that lots of community-based groups and educators want to create and run schools that reflect their own visions of the good life. If policy supports an expansive, diverse educational landscape, we enable more families to find the right fit, and we give power to kids, parents, educators, and local nonprofits.

The types of communities that emerge are the result of voluntary choices—people choose to start schools, people choose to teach in these schools, people choose to enroll their kids in these schools. This elevates the “pluribus” part of e pluribus unum—out of many, one. School choice recognizes that we are many.

Neighborhood public schools are built on a geographic understanding of community. People live in a place and are part of that society because of proximity. They shop at the same stores, eat at the same restaurants, walk in the same parks. And their kids go to the same schools. Because of this familiarity, they build bonds, sympathies, networks of mutual support, and shared experiences that are good for collective life.

Because geographic areas can be diverse in terms of background, income, and more, neighborhood schools help bridge our differences. We meet, work with, and learn with others. These schools are part of a democratically controlled system, meaning the geographic community—parents and nonparents alike—shares responsibility for its schools. The community builds solidarity through collective power and collective duty.

Neighborhood schools can pass along to the next generation a geography’s customs and sensibilities. These schools can be entwined—after years of collaboration—with the local library, local charities, local health clinics. They can have longstanding relationships with close-to-home employers and colleges. They are the place where people vote and watch basketball games. They are an actual, physical representation of an area’s investment in the future.

Of course, school boundaries can appear arbitrary. Sometimes they cut down the middle of a street or split a town in two. But that’s because central-office administrators need to think about bus routes and classroom capacity. Yes, the lines a superintendent’s team draws can serve the purposes of the bureaucracy better than the community’s families.

And yes, school boundaries have sometimes been drawn to divide people by race and class. That’s awful. And yes, the very nature of school boundaries and the residence-based assignments they support can force some families into schools that are ineffective or unsafe. That is unjust.

All of these things should be addressed by policymakers and administrators. They can undermine the health of an education system and the satisfaction of families.

But those things don’t erase the value of neighborhood schools. The virtues of geographic-based communities should not be ignored, even if we decide, in particular circumstances, the school-choice side of the scale is weightier.

Editor’s note: This first appeared as a comment in Mike Petrilli’s Substack, SCHOOLED.

Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Topics:
Governance
Tags: Educational equity Public education School choice Substack

Andy Smarick is a senior fellow at the Manhattan Institute. He previously served as an education aide at the White House Domestic Policy Council and U.S. House of Representatives and was deputy assistant secretary at the U.S. Department of Education, president of the state board of education in Maryland, and deputy commissioner of education in New Jersey.

Related Content

view
Gadfly Bites logo
School Funding

Gadfly Bites 10/7/26—A matter of perspective

Jeff Murray 10.7.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
School Choice

Are portfolio districts the future—or the past? | Episode 1037 of The Education Gadfly Show

Kevin Shafer, Michael J. Petrilli, David Griffith, Ph.D., Amber M. Northern, Ph.D. 10.7.2026
NationalPodcast
view
Report card math data blog image
Standards & Accountability

State report cards set the baseline for math improvement in Ohio

Jessica Poiner 10.6.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]