Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Robotic learning

7.14.2010

WALL-E becomes a teacher? Robotics labs around the world are experimenting with a new role for robots: educator. The concept behind it is simple, namely that interactive teaching is much more effective than the passive kind. So it makes sense that RUBI, a University of California San Diego, MIT, and University of Joensuu robot that was tasked with teaching nine toddlers Finnish, had results on par with a human—and significantly better than language tapes. In general, researchers see robots as a supplement to human teachers, not a replacement. Though many of the ‘bots can internalize and scaffold information—making future decisions based on past experiences—there are obvious limitations. Interestingly, the ‘bots are most effective with younger and/or autistic children, who ostensibly can get past the fact that their playmate/teacher is not human, and can then interact with them. Autistic children particularly benefit from the robots’ unlimited patience, a quality no human can replicate, and the ability of robots to perfectly mimic the child’s movements, one of the main ways (“synchronization”) that such children relate to others. As for the future, engineers are convinced they can fine tune how robots “learn” so that it’s mostly self-guided. Then the question might be not if robots can be teachers but how and when. And then the NEA will need to decide: Organize the robots or not?

“Students, Meet Your New Teacher, Mr. Robot,” by Benedict Carey and John Markoff, New York Times, July 10, 2010

Tags: National Education Association
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]