Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Open enrollment deserves bipartisan support

Jude Schwalbach
2.27.2025
Student entering a school
Getty Images/seb_ra

In recent years, school choice has made impressive strides. Eleven states have codified universal or near-universal private school choice programs. Still, most of this progress has occurred in red-leaning states, such as Florida or Arizona, and some advocates fear the momentum school choice gained during and after the Covid-19 pandemic will soon sputter out. In National Review, Notre Dame University’s Nicole Stelle Garnett theorized that private school choice expansions will likely hit a “blue wall” in states where policymakers have not been open to expansive choice programs, such as Pennsylvania.

However, educators, and lawmakers should consider options for advancing school choice far more broadly. One potential opportunity: strengthen and expand K–12 open enrollment, which allows students to attend public schools outside their residential zones as long as space is available.

The latest national polling from EdChoice showed that 79 percent of Democrats, 75 percent of Republicans, and 73 percent of independents with school-aged children support open enrollment.

There are two types of public-school open enrollment: within-district, which lets students transfer to schools inside their assigned district, and cross-district, which lets students enroll outside district boundaries. The hallmark of a strong open enrollment law is that all districts must participate so long as schools have open seats available.

Like other school choice policies, open enrollment has gained momentum since the pandemic. Reason Foundation research finds that “twenty-one states have either a robust cross- or within-district open enrollment policy, while twenty-nine states do not, leaving 30 million students with limited school options.”

Since 2021, nine states have codified strong open enrollment laws, including Oklahoma, Kansas, and West Virginia. But before this recent surge, it wasn’t just red states: six were red or leaned red, three leaned blue and three were purple states. Blue-leaning and purple states, including Delaware and Colorado, have very successful open enrollment laws; others, like California and Washington, have elements of successful public school transfer programs.

In Delaware, whose program ranked seventh in Reason Foundation’s report, about 22 percent of public school students used open enrollment during the 2020–21 school year to find an alternative that was the right fit for them.

Kansas codified its strong open enrollment laws in 2022 with a Democratic governor. Preliminary reports show that more than 1,500 students used the state’s cross-district open enrollment program just launched in 2024.

Colorado passed its open enrollment law back in 1990. During the 2023–24 school year, nearly 200,000 Colorado students, 28 percent of the traditional public school population, used open enrollment to find the best public school for them. This is especially notable because this past November, Colorado voters rejected a statewide constitutional amendment to establish a right to private school choice. Colorado illustrates how strong open enrollment laws can enjoy success in states where other forms of school choice may struggle to gain traction.

With 2025 legislative sessions starting, lawmakers and school choice advocates should consider public school open enrollment proposals that expand options for families. With its widespread popularity among parents and its success across red, purple, and blue states, open enrollment is a winning political issue for the right and left that can benefit the tens of millions of students in public schools.

Editor’s note: This was first published by The 74.

Policy Priority:
Quality Choices
Topics:
Evidence-Based Learning
Governance
Teachers & School Leaders
Tags: Arizona California Colorado Delaware Democratic Party EdChoice Kansas Oklahoma Pennsylvania Reason Foundation West Virginia
+6 More Show Less

Jude Schwalbach is a senior policy analyst at Reason Foundation. Schwalbach previously worked at Heritage Foundation's Center for Education Policy.

Related Content

view
Ohio charter news logo
School Choice

Ohio Charter News Weekly – 9.18.26

Jeff Murray 9.18.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Gadfly Bites logo
School Funding

Gadfly Bites 9/18/26—Professor Kogan says: Always read the appendixes

Jeff Murray 9.18.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Gadfly Guy

What we’re reading: September 18, 2026

The Education Gadfly 9.18.2026
NationalFlypaper
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]