Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

A new way to measure school quality

David Griffith, Ph.D. Meredith Coffey, Ph.D.
8.6.2025
Mother and son touring city
Getty Images/Worawee Meepian
Listen to this article
Loading the Elevenlabs Text to Speech AudioNative Player...

Education savings accounts in Texas. Open enrollment in Missouri. Each week seems to bring a new story and more education options for American students.

But to make the most of these new opportunities, families need the full picture.

So what information do they have currently? And what additional data would it make sense for them to have?

When it comes to public schools, whether neighborhood schools, magnets, or charters, the most common data points are academic achievement and year-to-year growth in math and reading, as measured on standardized tests.

Although this information is crucial—something is very wrong if the kids can’t pass the tests—critics from both sides of the aisle rightly note that it doesn’t capture everything that families should want to know about a school’s academics.

For example, what about subjects like history and science, which are tested less frequently than reading and math? What about foreign languages, the arts and other subjects that aren’t tested at all? And what about all the stuff that good schools impart that tests don’t capture, like critical thinking, teamwork, self-discipline, and respect for others?

For years, education reformers who believe that data are critical to improving America’s schools but recognize the limitations of standardized tests have struggled to answer these questions. That’s why a recent analysis that explores a new and potentially powerful measure of school quality called high school readiness is so exciting.

As the name suggests, the basic idea is to capture how well a middle school prepares its students for the next stage of their education by quantifying its effects on high school grades—or to be more precise, ninth-grade grade-point averages.

The report finds that middle schools have a significant impact on students’ future grades. For example, in North Carolina and Maryland, attending a middle school with a strong high school readiness score boosted a student’s ninth-grade GPA by approximately one-tenth of a grade point.

Figure 1. Effect of attending a middle school with a higher high school readiness score on ninth-grade GPA

Figure ES-1: Attending a middle school with high GPA-based value-added has a sizable effect on a student's 9th grade GPA.

Note: This figure shows the estimated effect of attending a middle school with a GPA value-added score that is 1 standard deviation above the average middle school’s score on the average student’s ninth-grade GPA in North Carolina and Maryland.

One-tenth of a grade point may not sound like much, but it’s enough to keep a marginal student out of the University of California or Texas A&M. And that increase is fairly impressive when you consider the number of factors that can affect GPA, from the quality of a student’s elementary school to his or her socioeconomic circumstances and home life.

Importantly, schools’ influences on GPAs aren’t necessarily the same as their effects on test scores. In fact, the two are only weakly correlated.

Figure 2. Middle schools that boost students’ test scores don’t necessarily boost their high school GPAs

Figure ES-4: GPA-based growth is weakly correlated with test-based growth.

Note: This figure shows the correlation between value-added to ninth-grade GPA and value-added to ninth-grade math achievement for Maryland middle schools. Data come from the Maryland Department of Education.

In other words, analyzing middle schools’ effects on grades reveals something new and different about how schools serve students—which the many families who don’t care exclusively about test scores might want to consider when choosing a school.

While it may seem strange to suggest evaluating middle schools based on their students’ high school readiness, many states already do something similar at the high school level, where indicators of college and career readiness have long been an accepted part of school report cards.

And while there are technical challenges associated with isolating middle schools’ effects on high school grades, most states already provide publicly available school report cards, and most already collect data on students’ high school GPAs. So, with a bit of number-crunching and some clear messaging, a new high school readiness indicator could give families the information they’re looking for—and begin to move America’s education system away from its obsession with standardized tests and toward a broader concept of student success.

As educational options expand, so should the information available to families. Test scores alone will never paint a complete picture of school quality or student success. But in the age of big data, there is no shortage of paint.

Editor’s note: This was first published by The 74.

Policy Priority:
Quality Choices
Topics:
Evidence-Based Learning
Charter Schools
Governance
Private School Choice
Tags: Educator Pay Grading in education Maryland North Carolina Texas

David Griffith is the National Research Director at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, where he manages or authors reports on various subjects including charter schools, …

View Full Bio

Meredith Coffey is the senior policy and operations associate at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, where she writes commentary, conducts research, and manages events. Her work has been published or cited in outlets including …

View Full Bio

Related Content

view
Gadfly Bites logo
School Funding

Gadfly Bites 9/30/26—Sounding smart

Aaron Churchill 9.30.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Standards & Accountability

School discipline: A new rulebook (again) | Episode 1036 of The Education Gadfly Show

Kimberly Richey, Michael J. Petrilli, David Griffith, Ph.D., Amber M. Northern, Ph.D. 9.30.2026
NationalPodcast
view
Advanced math blog image
Standards & Accountability

How Ohio’s brand-new advanced math policy will work

Aaron Churchill 9.29.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]