Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

New NCES analysis: Big declines at the top during the NCLB era

Michael J. Petrilli
5.18.2010

A new analysis of U.S. performance on the international PISA exam in mathematics shows significant declines for students at the top and middle of the achievement distribution from 2003 to 2006.* This is the strongest evidence to date that the performance of America's highest-achieving students dropped during the early years of No Child Left Behind's implementation. It's impossible to know whether the federal law caused this trend, but it's plausible that the pressure NCLB placed on schools to raise the scores of their lowest performing students encouraged them to give less attention to students in the middle and at the top.

Though the analysis shows gains for the nation's lowest-performing students, they are tiny compared to the large decreases at the top and middle. The achievement gap is closing?but certainly not in the way policymakers intended.

What's your take on these data? Please let me know by posting a comment below.

* This chart was prepared by staff at the National Center for Education Statistics at my request. A few weeks ago I saw a presentation about Australian performance on PISA by Barry McGraw, former head of the education division of the OECD. He showed a chart similar to this one for Australia, and I wondered if similar data existed for the U.S. They did, but they were buried in technical reports until now. Many thanks to the NCES staff for making this critical information more accessible.

?Mike Petrilli

Tags: Australia National Center for Education Statistics No Child Left Behind Act Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Programme for International Student Assessment

President, Thomas B. Fordham Institute

Michael J. PetrilliĀ is president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, executive editor of Education Next, editor in chief of the Education Gadfly Weekly, host of the…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]