Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Gadfly Podcast
      • Flypaper Blog
      • Events
    • Covid-19
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
    • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • High Achievers
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
    • Events
  • COVID-19
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

How students react to news of their AP potential

Amber M. Northern, Ph.D.
12.2.2015

This study examines whether information supplied about a student’s ability helps inform that student’s decision to enroll in Advanced Placement classes. Specifically, the information “signal” is the “AP Potential” message on the student’s PSAT Results Report, as written by the College Board. Students who score at a certain cut point on the PSAT get a message that says, “Congratulations! Your score shows you have potential for success in an at least one AP course!” or else a message that says, “Be sure to talk to your counselor about how to increase your preparedness.”

Students in Oakland Technical High School who took the PSAT in 2013 made up the sample of roughly five hundred sophomores. The intervention was as follows: Right before and after they received their PSAT results that included one of the AP Potential messages above, they were given a survey that asked them (1) how they perceived their academic abilities and their plans relative to attending college; (2) the number of AP courses they plan to take; (3) whether they would take the SAT; (4) the probability that they’d pass the exit exam; and (5) the probability that they’d graduate high school.

Analysts found that the AP signal contained information that led students to revise their beliefs about their ability and future academic plans from the first survey to the second. Specifically, the PSAT is a “negative information shock” on average, meaning that students tended to adjust down their beliefs about their ability. Students who got bad news revised their beliefs down by .286 points on a five-point scale, whereas those who got good news increased their beliefs about their academic ability by only .187 points. Of all the beliefs surveyed, however, expectations around AP course enrollment were most affected by the new information. Students who upwardly revised their expectations in response to the new information enrolled in more AP classes compared to those who did not revise expectations.

The authors also found that students at the margins who were surveyed (a group for which three-quarters were minorities) and told they had AP Potential enrolled in and passed approximately one more AP class the following semester—and were more likely to take and pass one or more AP exams. But these patterns did not hold for non-surveyed students, suggesting that filling out the survey itself increased the salience of the information and made for an “intensified treatment.” Yet students near the margin who didn’t get the AP Potential signal took fewer AP classes, even though both groups were nearly identical in ability. So there is both an upside and a downside to the intervention, depending on whether the message to students is positive or negative. Perhaps we should just deliver the good news?

SOURCE: Naihobe Gonzalez, "Information Shocks about Ability and the Decision to Enroll in Advanced Placement: Evidence from the PSAT," Mathematica (October 2015).

Policy Priority:
High Expectations

Amber Northern is senior vice president for research at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, where she supervises the Institute’s studies and research staff.  She has published in the areas of educational accountability, principal leadership, teacher quality, and academic standards, among others. Prior to joining Fordham, she served as senior study director at Westat. In that role, she provided evaluation services…

View Full Bio

Sign Up to Receive Fordham Updates

We'll send you quality research, commentary, analysis, and news on the education issues you care about.
Thank you for signing up!
Please check your email to confirm the subscription.

Related Content

view
Carson v Makin blog image
School Choice

The Ohio connection to Carson v. Makin

Nathaniel Grossman 7.1.2022
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
High Expectations

Building better evidence on pre-K by strengthening assessments of children’s skills

Meghan McCormick 7.1.2022
NationalFlypaper
view
Ohio charter news logo
School Choice

Ohio Charter News Weekly – 7.1.22

Chad L. Aldis, Jeff Murray 7.1.2022
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
Fordham Logo

© 2020 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1016 16th St NW, 8th Floor 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • <
Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]