Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Affirmative action: the sequel

11.19.2003

After the Supreme Court's recent ruling in two Michigan affirmative action cases, Gratz and Grutter, legal scholars predicted that a flurry of suits would seek to round out the Court's somewhat confusing jurisprudence on this topic. One of these cases, Doe v. Kamehameha, took its first step toward the high court this week, where most observers-including the judge in the case - predict it is likely to end up. The case concerns a private school supported by the Bishop Trust, a charitable trust founded in the 1880s by the last direct descendant of King Kamehameha I, with the goal of supporting and cultivating native Hawaiian culture. Two non-Hawaiian students who were denied admission to the school because of its policy of barring non-natives sued for racial discrimination. A federal judge dismissed the boys' claim on grounds that the remedial education provided by the school, expressly for the purpose of raising the educational and economic prospects of native Hawaiians, trumps longstanding case law forbidding racial discrimination in private education. The case now goes to a federal appeals court; you can read the judge's full decision at http://gohawaii.about.com/library/weekly/bl_doe_vs_kamehameha.htm.

"Kamehameha Schools win admissions case," by David Waitte, Honolulu Star-Advertiser, November 18, 2003

Tags: Supreme Court of the United States
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]