Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Tracking the stimulus

Tracking the stimulus
9.10.2009

I'm writing quarterly reports for AEI on the implementation and influence of the education provisions of the ARRA (the federal stimulus legislation). The second report was just released; you can find it here and a brief description here.

Major takeaways:

--Despite Secretary Duncan's pleas, about $75 billion in formula-based program funds are being used to maintain the status quo instead of to drive reform

--The severity and longevity of the recession have complicated matters at the state and local level; budgets will continue to be adversely influenced for some time

--Most state and district education cuts are short-sighted and non-strategic

--Though prescriptive, the administration's priorities for the Race to the Top are reform-oriented

--A number of states have already changed education laws and policies????for the better????to improve their chances at competing for Race to the Top dollars

--Given the significant state and local budget shortfalls, we should be mindful of the possibility that Race to the Top recipients will use these funds to protect existing jobs and programs instead of launching new, promising initiatives

--For a number of reasons we should guard against assuming that????Race to the Top grants and????changes in state laws will generate meaningful, sustainable improvements in student learning.

Tags: American Enterprise Institute American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 Race to the Top
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]