Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Opting out has minimal impact on Ohio school grades

Jamie Davies O'Leary
2.29.2016

Leading up to this year’s report card release, some school districts expressed concern about the negative impact of students opting out of state assessments on their report card grades. In response, lawmakers proposed a well-intentioned but shortsighted bill attempting to mitigate the impact of opt-outs—first by erasing non-test-takers from their schools’ performance grades and then (after being amended) by reporting two separate Performance Index grades. The Ohio Department of Education devised a temporary reporting solution: Performance Index scores would be reported as normal (including the impact of non-test-takers, as per current law), but a “modified achievement measure” would be made available to illustrate how districts would have scored if non-test-takers didn’t count.

A quick look at the data shows that the impact of opt-outs last year (2014–15) was minimal for the vast majority of Ohio school districts. As depicted in Table 1, fifty-two districts (8.5 percent) experienced a letter grade change because of their non-participation rates (shaded in green). This was most likely driven by the opt-out movement. It’s hard to say for sure, though, because Ohio only captures test participation rates and not the reasons for non-participation—which might include excused or unexcused absences, truancy, or opting out.

After looking at differences between actual, reported Performance Index scores (which include the impact of non-test-takers) and “modified” scores (removing non-test-takers), it becomes apparent that a very small number of districts were significantly impacted. Just thirty-five districts had a difference between scores of 5 percent or greater. Only eleven districts (fewer than 2 percent) were heavily impacted, with Performance Index score differences of 10 percent or greater. Four of those districts were severely impacted with more than one-quarter of students not participating in state testing: Firelands Local, Tri-Valley Local, Centerburg Local, and Marion Local.

Ohio’s overall test participation rate of 99 percent exceeds the federal requirement of 95 percent, which means that the state will avoid a corrective action plan (unlike thirteen other states) or withholding of federal funds. Even though some districts would have their grades lowered, it’s important to note that there were no sanctions or penalties as Ohio schools, and districts remain in safe harbor until 2018. In the meantime, schools must continue to emphasize the importance of state exams and achieving full participation—especially in the handful of communities experiencing worrisome non-participation rates. Families who elect to opt out must realize the ramifications of their decisions—adverse impact on the reputation of schools and their staffs, and the eventual effect this could have on property values—and know that by 2018, opting out in large force could negatively impact their schools and communities.

Table 1: Districts that experienced a letter grade change and/or 5 percent or higher discrepancy between actual Performance Index score and modified score (2014–15)

[[{"fid":"115695","view_mode":"default","fields":{"format":"default"},"type":"media","attributes":{"class":"media-element file-default"},"link_text":null}]]

Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Tags: Ohio Ohio Department of Education
Jamie is the former Senior Ohio Policy Analyst for the Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
 
 
View Full Bio

Related Content

view
Charter performance - 2025-26 blog image
School Choice

Ohio charter schools’ performance in 2025–26

Aaron Churchill 10.2.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Ohio charter news logo
School Choice

Ohio Charter News Weekly – 10.2.26

Jeff Murray 10.2.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Gadfly Bites logo
School Funding

Gadfly Bites 10/2/26—Two weird tricks

Jeff Murray 10.2.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]