Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

NEW REPORT: Rising Tide: Charter School Market Share and Student Achievement

The Education Gadfly
9.26.2019

Plenty of studies have compared the progress of students in charter schools versus traditional public schools. And more than a dozen have examined the “competitive effects” of charters on neighboring district schools. Yet, to our knowledge, no prior study has directly addressed the trillion-dollar question—that is, whether overall achievement increases as the “market share” of charter schools grows.

Rising Tide: Charter School Market Share and Student Achievement, authored by Fordham’s David Griffith, is a first-of-its-kind study that looks at the relationship between “charter market share” and the academic achievement of all students in a given community, including those in traditional public schools. To accomplish this, the report uses data from a new source, which allows researchers to compare English language arts and math scores from thousands of school districts and dozens of different tests.

The study has three findings:

  1. In large urban areas, higher charter market share is associated with significant achievement gains for black and Hispanic students.
  2. In suburban and rural areas, higher charter market share is associated with significant achievement gains for Hispanic students, and black students in rural districts also see gains.
  3. There is no evidence that higher charter market share is associated with achievement gains for white students.

These findings are the basis for three takeaways:

  1. In general, the district-level evidence suggests that the charter advantage is not attributable to “cherry-picking” or “creaming” the best students.
  2. Similarly, there is no evidence that charters have a negative effect on the performance of traditional public schools.
  3. Expanding charter market share in black and Hispanic communities could dramatically reduce racial achievement gaps.

In short, the report is consistent with prior research that suggests black and Hispanic students learn more in charter schools, and that competition from charter schools has a positive, or at worst neutral, effect on traditional public schools.

In other words, a rising tide of charters really does lift all boats.

Policy Priority:
Quality Choices
Topics:
Charter Schools
Tags: English studies
The Education Gadfly

Related Content

view
Slow road sign
High Expectations

How states can slow the staffing surge

Aaron Garth Smith 9.22.2026
NationalFlypaper
view
Ohio academic recovery blog image
Standards & Accountability

Will Ohio ever make a full academic recovery?

Aaron Churchill 9.22.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
view
Charter renewal term length report SR image
School Choice

Examining charter school contract renewal length decisions by authorizers

Jeff Murray 9.22.2026
OhioOhio Gadfly Daily
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]