Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Education Gadfly Weekly
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • EEPS
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
    • Sponsorship
      • Application
      • Sponsored Schools
      • Resources
      • Our Work in Dayton
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • About
Home Home

National Menu

  • Policy
    • High Expectations
    • Quality Choices
    • Personalized Pathways
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Education Gadfly Weekly
    • Flypaper Blog
  • Events
  • EEPS
High Expectations
Quality Choices

Rising Tide: Charter School Market Share and Student Achievement

David Griffith
Foreword by:
Michael J. Petrilli
Amber M. Northern, Ph.D.
9.26.2019
9.26.2019

Plenty of studies have compared the progress of students in charter schools versus traditional public schools. And more than a dozen have examined the “competitive effects” of charters on neighboring district schools. Yet, to our knowledge, no prior study has directly addressed the trillion-dollar question—that is, whether overall achievement increases as the “market share” of charter schools grows.

Rising Tide: Charter School Market Share and Student Achievement, authored by Fordham’s David Griffith, is a first-of-its-kind study that looks at the relationship between “charter market share” and the academic achievement of all students in a given community, including those in traditional public schools. To accomplish this, the report uses data from a new source, which allows researchers to compare English language arts and math scores from thousands of school districts and dozens of different tests.

The study has three findings:

  1. In large urban areas, higher charter market share is associated with significant achievement gains for black and Hispanic students.
  2. In suburban and rural areas, higher charter market share is associated with significant achievement gains for Hispanic students, and black students in rural districts also see gains.
  3. There is no evidence that higher charter market share is associated with achievement gains for white students.

These findings are the basis for three takeaways:

  1. In general, the district-level evidence suggests that the charter advantage is not attributable to “cherry-picking” or “creaming” the best students.
  2. Similarly, there is no evidence that charters have a negative effect on the performance of traditional public schools.
  3. Expanding charter market share in black and Hispanic communities could dramatically reduce racial achievement gaps.

In short, the report is consistent with prior research that suggests black and Hispanic students learn more in charter schools, and that competition from charter schools has a positive, or at worst neutral, effect on traditional public schools.

In other words, a rising tide of charters really does lift all boats.

Policy Priority:
High Expectations
Quality Choices
Topics:
Accountability & Testing
Charter Schools
Download

David Griffith is a senior research and policy associate at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, where he helps manage a variety of projects in Fordham’s research pipeline. A native of Portland, Oregon, David holds a bachelor’s degree in politics and philosophy from Pomona College and a master’s degree in public policy from Georgetown University. Prior to joining Fordham, he worked as a staffer for Congressman Earl Blumenauer…

View Full Bio

Report Materials

Foreword & Executive Summary

9.26.2019

In The Media

Wall Street Journal: Charter Schools Ace Another Test

10.3.2019

The 74: Challenging Charter Critics, New Study Finds that as Sector Enrollment Grows, So Do Test Scores for Black and Hispanic Students

9.26.2019

Chalkbeat: Do charter schools ‘lift all boats’? Here’s what the latest research tells us

10.2.2019

Related Resources

view
Quality Choices

America's Best (and Worst) Cities for School Choice

Priscilla Wohlstetter, Ph.D., Dara Zeehandelaar Shaw, Ph.D., David Griffith 12.9.2015
NationalReport
view

Is Detente Possible? District-charter school relations in four cities

Daniela Doyle, Christen Holly, Bryan C. Hassel 11.4.2015
NationalReport
view
School Choice

Charter School Performance in Ohio—2019

2.19.2019
OhioReport
Fordham Logo

© 2018 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

1016 16th St NW, 8th Floor 
Washington, DC 20036

202.223.5452

[email protected]

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • Linkedin
Ohio

100 E. Broad Street, Suite 2430
Columbus, OH 43215

614.223.1580

[email protected]

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]