Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education

Terry Ryan
9.18.2002

edited by M. Suzanne Donovan and Christopher T. Cross, National Research Council
2002

As Congress debates reauthorization of the Individuals with Disabilities Education Act (IDEA) later this year and into next, reports like "Minority Students in Special and Gifted Education" by the National Research Council will receive much attention. The main point of this hefty volume, issued by the Committee on Minority Representation in Special Education, is that minority youngsters who are ill-prepared for school should first receive some quality classroom instruction and social support such as tutoring before being channeled into special education programs. IDEA should not become a perverse safety net for schools and communities that have failed to teach children basic skills. This report also reminds all who seek to shrink the achievement gap between white and minority students that the effort must start at the onset of their education, or even earlier. According to the Committee, "there is substantial evidence with regard to both behavior and achievement that early identification and intervention is more effective than later identification and intervention." Despite this fact, the report continues, "the current special education identification process relies on a 'wait-to-fail' principle that both increases the likelihood that children will fail because they do not receive early supports and decreases the effectiveness of supports once they are received." To meet the needs of at-risk children as well as those of gifted students, the Committee urges making certain that teacher licensing and certification requirements call for training in effective intervention methods to assist students who fail to meet minimum academic standards-or who exceed them. You'll find plenty to chew on in this report, available at http://www.nap.edu/catalog/10128.html.

Tags: Individuals with Disabilities Education Act National Research Council Canada Special education United States Congress

Terry Ryan was Vice-President for Ohio Programs and Policy at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, and a Research Fellow at the Hoover Research Institution.

He is the author, with Chester E. Finn, Jr. and Michael Lafferty of Ohio’s Education Reform Challenges: Lessons from the Frontlines (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).

Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]