Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Maryland's draft RTT application

Maryland's draft RTT application
4.13.2010

Maryland released its draft RTT application today, giving the world its first peek into the state's plans (it didn't apply in round one). Baltimore Sun coverage here, Washington Post here.

Over the last couple months, I've been very tough on Maryland. To date it has been a real RTT laggard.

But the state's application is a bit better than I expected. It plays up its strengths well, includes a couple new ideas, and puts together a comprehensive pitch.

But there is a major problem. Though there are weaknesses in the data and charter sections, Maryland--like many other states--comes up very short in the teachers section. Rather than going bold, it attempts to capture lots of stakeholders. That's not a recipe for success.

Interestingly, the state released this draft to the public more than 6 weeks before the submission deadline. Unfortunately, this will give stakeholders lots of opportunity to try to weaken the plan.??But it also gives the state the chance to fix its shortcomings.

If the plan is lefts as-is, I'm confident that it won't win. But with some important changes, it will be in the discussion. But those changes (to teacher evaluations, tenure, compensation, and terminations) will anger stakeholders.

So for the next 45 days, Maryland will be forced to wrestle with the ultimate RTT question: Do we go bold and sacrifice buy-in or water down the plan to get more stakeholders on board.

Time will tell.

--Andy Smarick

Tags: Maryland
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]