Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Major concerns raised by Georgia

Major concerns raised by Georgia
3.17.2010

In this report from several months ago, I predicted, with worry, that some state RTT applications would appear on the surface to be gung-ho reform, but when layers were peeled back, the state's commitment would come into question. Georgia's RTT application substantiates this concern and underscores just how important it is for the Department to get tough.

In its section on teachers, Georgia discusses a bold performance pay program and strong action on certification and termination. But a close reading shows that these promises are contingent. In order to implement the new pay plan, brand new state legislation must be adopted. A compelling pay scale appears in the application but it represents "what teacher compensation might look like under the new legislation that is being introduced."

Similarly, the changes to policies on permanent certification and removal are all in the future tense: "The State will revise its certification rules..." (emphasis added)

In all of these instances, rather than already passing a new law or already changing regulations, the state pushes those activities into the future. In other words, these changes are potential, they are hypothetical. They may not happen.

And yet Georgia is a finalist.

If RTT is to be meaningful, the Department must buckle down on these issues. State promises absent substantial, verifiable changes are simply not good enough. RTT is an unprecedented and potentially never-to-be-seen-again opportunity. It must be defended accordingly.

Unfortunately, the "very, very high bar" continues to sag.

Tags: Georgia
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]