Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Higher Education Funding - International Comparisons

Carolyn Conner
2.11.2004

Department for Education and Skills, United Kingdom
February 2004

This paper gives a brief overview and comparison of participation, tuition rates, and government spending on higher education in several countries, focusing on the countries that belong to the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD). The findings are widely varied, with higher ed entry rates ranging from 20 percent in Turkey to 76 percent in New Zealand. Some countries, such as the United States and New Zealand, charge varied tuition for both public and private universities. Other countries, such as Germany and Sweden do not currently charge tuition to attend university. Other interesting tuition methods include those of Australia and China. In Australia (with a 65 percent participation rate) students do not pay any upfront fees. "Instead they repay their deferred fee after graduation once their income reaches Aus$25,000 a year." Meanwhile, in China "fees are set according to market conditions - taking into account both costs and demand." This paper does not make specific policy recommendations but does provide several interesting comparisons, especially as America's tuition fees continue to rise. To view the paper, visit http://image.guardian.co.uk/sys-files/Guardian/documents/2003/12/12/Intpaper.pdf.

Tags: Australia China Germany New Zealand Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Sweden United Kingdom
+2 More Show Less

Carolyn Conner is a former Research Assistant at the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. A graduate of Wake Forest University, she holds a B.A. in Anthropology. While at Wake Forest, she was actively involved in the Volunteer Service Corps and spent much of her free time volunteering and overseeing volunteer activity on campus through her position on the Volunteer Service Corps Advisory Board. She also spent time studying in…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]