Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Even ed profs think ed school accreditation is lacking

Janie Scull
10.26.2010

Last week, the two national accreditation bodies for teacher preparation programs?NCATE and TEAC?voted to standardize their accreditation processes and ultimately merge into a single organization. Organization leaders assert that the goal of the merger is not only to set clearer requirements for ed school accreditation, but also to raise the bar for programs entirely. NCATE leaders have also just announced an initiative to turn teacher preparation ?upside down.? Whether these reforms actually do improve teacher quality is yet to be seen, but it's about time NCATE and TEAC reevaluate their modus operandi. According to our survey of education professors?the very personnel who staff schools of education?only 7 percent believe that current NCATE or TEAC accreditation guarantees that a program is top-notch. Instead, 46 percent believe accreditation to be a base-line of acceptable quality, and 41 percent that it ensures very little other than procedural compliance.

?Janie Scull

Tags: National Council for Accreditation of Teacher Education
Janie Scull
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]