Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Ed profs back tenure reform, but not performance pay

Janie Scull
10.25.2010

Education professors are in step with some current reform initiatives targeted at improving teacher quality, but not others, according to our new survey of teacher educators.? A full 87 percent of ed profs favor making it easier to terminate unmotivated or incompetent teachers?even if they are tenured (see below).? The vast majority (79 percent) also favor requiring a minimum of 5 years before tenure is awarded and strengthening the formal teacher evaluation process. But ed profs balk at the idea of linking these reforms to test scores.? While they favor proficiency tests for both teachers and students in general (78 and 61 percent, respectively), they largely disapprove of giving financial incentives to teachers whose students routinely score higher than similar students. So basically ed profs favor? meaningful reform without accountability? Test scores may not be a perfect proxy for performance, but such metrics are unquestionably better than the evaluation systems we have in place now.? Seems these profs want to have their cake and eat it too.

Janie Scull
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]