Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

Denver and the school system of the future

Denver and the school system of the future
3.1.2010

Long ago, I concluded that the traditional urban school district structure was incapable of running a dynamic, self-improving system of high-performing schools. Though many conservatives and education reformers point to unions as the primary cause of dysfunction in big city public education, I don't. I blame the district structure.

It was created through a series of historical peculiarities, it hasn't come close to accomplishing its primary raison d'etre for 50 years, and, thanks to chartering, it has been shown to be expendable--that is, public education can and will go on without the traditional district system.

For these reasons and more my primary interest is in figuring out what the urban school system of the future looks like. I've written glowingly about NYC's and NO's work to fundamentally alter the district structure. Thanks to Joel Klein (and his very able team), Mike Bloomberg, Paul Pastorek, Paul Vallas, and others those cities have done remarkably good and important work that will serve as the model for years to come.

But I recently came across some information from Denver that has me intrigued and excited. The leaders there are also thinking creatively about how to manage a portfolio of schools in order to drive quality and provide choice while carefully addressing technical issues related to grade levels and geography.

You ought to check out this report, produced by??NACSA with support from the Michael and Susan Dell Foundation, which identifies which Denver schools are sufficiently high performing, which are not, and where these are located. It discusses the need to create high-quality seats in discrete locations and how the city might get there. Best of all, there's a level of what I call "sector agnosticism" ingrained in the report. It doesn't matter if it is a charter, magnet, or traditional public schools--all are evaluated based on quality. (Someday, hopefully soon, such studies will include private schools as well.)

The icing on the cake is this document, an RFP for new schools sent out by the??Denver Public Schools??Office of School Reform and??Innovation. If you scan the maps in each document, you'll see the connection between the first report's areas of need and the RFP's focus locations.

Seriously exciting stuff.

(Picture by dherrera_96 from Flickr)

--Andy Smarick

Tags: Denver Denver Public Schools Joel Klein Michael Bloomberg Paul Vallas
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]