Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Cold Comfort

Kristina Phillips-Schwartz Quentin Suffren
2.27.2007

Though most Ohioans are still thawing out from weeks of frosty weather, Columbus has been bustling with activity as many elected officials considered (or proposed themselves) a number of education initiatives--all claiming to improve Ohio’s education system.   

Most notable was the release of the new policy report Creating a World-Class Education System in Ohio by Achieve, Inc. (see here and above). Prepared by the international consulting group McKinsey & Company and authored by former British education adviser Sir Michael Barber, the report lays out a comprehensive, integrated and outcomes-based approach for transforming Ohio’s K-12 program into a leading education system by 2015. None too soon, we say. The state’s current system masks wide achievement gaps among student subgroups and is struggling to prepare Ohio’s youngster for the demands of college and workplace. “Despite the progress Ohio has made in student achievement, the pace of improvement needs to escalate drastically,” Barber told State Board of Education members.

Whether state policymakers will embrace the McKinsey team’s bold vision remains to be seen, but comments so far are promising. C.J. Prentiss, former state senator and Strickland’s education aide, noted, “I will report back to the governor ‘Good News’…This is a road map for what we need to do” (see here). State Superintendent of Public Instruction Susan Zelman insisted that state education officials have little choice but to push for change. Yet State Board member John Bender questioned the feasibility of implementing the report’s recommendations. “I still don’t see the political will,” he said (see here). Let’s hope he looks harder. Turning this vision into reality will require broad implementation of the recommendations (as opposed to “cherry-picking” the most politically expedient), and solid bipartisan support.

Such bipartisanship has been markedly absent from recent dealings on Capitol Square. Governor Strickland and Speaker John Husted are engaging in a tug-of-war over education funding (and the extent to which it needs repair--see here). Sharply critical of Ohio’s education funding system during his gubernatorial campaign, Governor Strickland has been reticent about putting forth solutions to fix it. To draw him out, Speaker Husted and Senate President Bill Harris designated House Bill 1 and Senate Bill 1 for Strickland’s unannounced education funding reform proposal (see here). The governor quickly condemned the move as “political gamesmanship” and partisan politics. Meanwhile, we’ve signaled our preference--a weighted student funding system (see here)--one that’s been echoed in the recent Achieve report.

The ill-conceived constitutional amendment to “fix” Ohio’s funding system (by pouring gobs more money into it--see here) met with a chilly reception from House and Senate Republicans. Citing a report by the nonpartisan Legislative Service Committee, Speaker Husted condemned the amendment, which, if passed, could cost the state about $1.84 billion in fiscal year 2007 alone. None of this new funding would be tied to student outcomes or measurable results. Considering that Ohioans are split on raising taxes (see here), this amendment may just end up in the deep freeze (for good, we hope). 

Undaunted, it seems, by moves to transfer control of its chancellorship to the governor (see here), the Ohio Board of Regents (OBR) recently aired a new proposal requesting sweeping new powers to oversee tuition hikes and cut duplicative degree programs at the state’s colleges and universities (see here). Reactions were mixed, and Governor Strickland noted that his and Speaker Husted’s earlier actions have “awakened the Board of Regents to the point where they are trying to play catch-up.” It may be too late, though, as Senate Bill 2 and House Bill 2 would both transfer most of OBR’s power to the appointed chancellor--and relegate OBR to advisory board status.

State Board member Tom Sawyer was appointed to the Ohio Senate to fill the seat of Kimberly Zurz, who was named director of the Department of Commerce by Governor Strickland (see here). In November, Sawyer ousted Deborah Owens Fink, in part, by winning the “Darwinian vote” (see here). Sawyer’s evolution will give the governor a chance to fill a State Board seat with a hand-picked appointee. Perhaps his choice will help divine Governor Strickland’s thoughts on education reform.

With Governor Strickland set to address the state and submit his biennial budget, Ohioans can look forward to plenty of March Madness (the Buckeyes notwithstanding) in the coming weeks.

Tags: Columbus Jon Husted Ohio Ohio Board of Regents Republican Party Ted Strickland United Kingdom United States Senate
+3 More Show Less

Kristi is the Ohio Policy and Information Manager for the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation. She comes to the Foundation from the Ohio Legislative Office of Education Oversight where she conducted research and evaluations of education programs funded by the state of Ohio.  Preceding that, she served as a legislative intern for the Ohio General Assembly and graduated from the Ohio State University with a MA in Educational…

View Full Bio

Quentin Suffren is chief academic officer at The Learning Institute (TLI) in Hot Springs, Arkansas. TLI provides assessment, data and curriculum services to 80 school districts (educating over 250,000 students) in Arkansas and Louisiana. At TLI, Quentin leads the curriculum and professional development teams that directly support school administrators, program coordinators and classroom teachers. Before assuming this role…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]