Over the course of thirteen days, Flypaper’s Charter School Wonk-a-Thon produced eleven posts jam-packed with sound analysis on charter school policy today. But who was the wisest, wonkiest wonk of all?
- “Boston’s high-quality charters make no excuses,” by Michael Goldstein
- “Building a great city charter sector,” by Andy Smarick
- "Strong standards, political air cover, and talent: Exporting the success of Boston’s charter school sector," by Jim Peyser
- "Thoughts on why some charter sectors outpace their local district schools while others are falling behind," by Jed Wallace and Elizabeth Robitaille
- "The California charter school paradox" by Greg Richmond
- "Charter school quality: Policy matters, but so does implementation," by Robin Lake
- "To achieve a strong charter sector, start with supportive laws," by Todd Ziebarth
- "The interdependence of strong authorizers and great school operators," by Alex Medler
- "Why we are betting on Washington State charters," by Marta Reyes Newberry and Terry Ryan
- "Schools educate kids; movements don’t," by Joe Siedlecki
- "‘More’ is the operative word for building a high-quality charter sector," by Kara Kerwin
Voting is closed
Policy Priority:
Topics:
