Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Beating the Odds III: A City-by-City Analysis of Student Performance and Achievement Gaps on State Assessments (Results from the 2001-2002 School Year)

Terry Ryan
4.9.2003

Council of the Great City Schools
March 2003

In its now-annual summary of student performance data in many of the nation's largest urban districts, the Council of the Great City Schools (CGCS) seeks to answer two fundamental questions: "Are urban schools improving academically?" and "Are urban schools closing achievement gaps?" As in the previous two editions, the answer for most districts is yes, though the challenge remains great. In looking at these data - this report is a statistician's dream - it's clear that some urban districts are making commendable academic progress but others aren't. There's plenty here to chew on - and considerable variance in available data. Dallas, for example, has data on grades 3-8 every year since 1994 and a separate section on the achievement gap. Detroit, by comparison, has data only for grades 4 and 7 in reading, and no separate breakout showing the achievement gap. Such differences expose how much work some states still have to do to align their assessment systems with the requirements of No Child Left Behind. For a copy, proceed to http://www.cgcs.org/reports/beat_the_oddsIII.html.

Tags: Dallas Detroit No Child Left Behind Act

Terry Ryan was Vice-President for Ohio Programs and Policy at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, and a Research Fellow at the Hoover Research Institution.

He is the author, with Chester E. Finn, Jr. and Michael Lafferty of Ohio’s Education Reform Challenges: Lessons from the Frontlines (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).

Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]