Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Topics

Displaying 301-319 of 319 results
Commentary
5.23.2001

Every Child Reading: A Professional Development Guide

Charles R. Hokanson, Jr.

Learning First Alliance

Commentary
5.23.2001

Standards: How High is High Enough?

Chester E. Finn, Jr.

Achieve Policy Brief

Commentary
5.23.2001

Direct Instruction and the Teaching of Early Reading: Wisconsin's Teacher-Led Insurgency, Wisconsin Policy Research Institute

Chester E. Finn, Jr.

Fans of "direct instruction," and those who would like to learn more about it, will want to examine this new report from the Wisconsin Policy Research Institute. It was catalyzed by three facts: (a) Direct Instruction, properly done, is a teaching method (and curriculum) that is known to be effective, particularly with younger children and especially in reading.

Commentary
5.23.2001

Clearing up the confusion over testing

Crack education journalist Jay Matthews reacted to anti-testing articles in a thoughtful column appearing only in the electronic version of the Washington Post.

Commentary
5.23.2001

Ignoring the Lessons from Cinderella School Districts

Diane Ravitch

On May 23, 2001, the New York Times ran three major stories demonstrating cognitive dissonance about educational approaches. On the front page, we learned about Ms. Moffett, a first-year teacher assigned to a low-performing school who is extremely frustrated because she is required to follow lesson plans instead of doing what she wants, which is to demonstrate her creativity.

Commentary
5.23.2001

It Takes More Than Testing: Closing the Achievement Gap

Center on Education Policy

Commentary
5.23.2001

Measuring What Matters: Using Assessment and Accountability to Improve Student Learning

Committee for Economic Development

Commentary
5.17.2001

Fixing Special Education Will Take More than Just Money

In a sideshow to the main debate over ESEA, the Senate passed an amendment on May 3 that would add $18.1 billion to the federal budget for special education over the next 10 years and would change special ed funding into an entitlement that Congress would be required to fund regardless of budget considerations.  This measure has drawn criticism from the White House and others for not addre

Commentary
5.16.2001

TIMSS 1999 Benchmarking Achievement Reports

The Third International Math and Science Study (TIMSS) made quite a splash in the U.S. when its 1995 results came out, mostly because it showed American kids sorely under-performing their counterparts in many other lands in math and science, especially in the upper grades.

Commentary
5.16.2001

Are Today's High School Graduates Ready?

Chester E. Finn, Jr.

The Education Trust's newsletter, Thinking K-16, is usually worth a look. The Winter 2001 issue is especially fine, being devoted almost entirely to a careful but exceptionally lucid discussion of U.S. high school results during the period since the Nation at Risk report of 1983 and the declaration of national education goals in 1989. How have we fared?

Commentary
5.16.2001

Fourth Grade Reading

The National Assessment of Educational Progress (NAEP) recently released the results of the 4th grade reading assessment conducted in 2000. (By NAEP standards, alas, this is speedy: data available just a year after the test was given!) The news is not good: average scores were essentially flat across the 1990's.

Commentary
5.16.2001

Bullying, Violence, Zero Tolerance, and Dodge Ball

Thirty percent of students surveyed in grades 6 through 10 have been involved in either bullying or being bullied themselves, according to a study released by the National Institute of Child Health and Human Development (NICHD) earlier this month.

Commentary
5.16.2001

Real Results, Remaining Challenges: The Story of Texas Education Reform

Kelly Scott

by Craig Jerald, the Education Trust (published by the Business Roundtable)

Commentary
5.16.2001

One Day, All Children & The Unlikely Triumph of Teach for America and What I Learned Along the Way

Like many skillful leaders whose successes throw them before the public's eye, Wendy Kopp has her share of detractors, including some within the ranks of the unique teaching corps she created.

Commentary
5.16.2001

Raising Achievement and Reducing Gaps: Reporting Progress Toward Goals for Academic Achievement.

The redoubtable Paul Barton, formerly of the Educational Testing Service,  prepared this March 2001 report for the National Education Goals Panel. Based on NAEP data, it seeks to track and explain state-level performance trends. He's done some interesting "quartile analysis" as well as taken a close look at minority/white achievement gaps.

Commentary
5.16.2001

Just How Bad is the Education Bill?

Chester E. Finn, Jr.

White House aides have grown testy about the education bill, unwilling to acknowledge that the compromises Congress has forced upon it have sorely weakened George W. Bush's fine reform plan. Presumably because they assented to those compromises, they feel obliged to insist that the plan remains largely intact.Would that it were so.

Commentary
5.16.2001

Can outsiders revitalize urban school districts?

Can a new breed of superintendents--drawn from outside the ranks of traditional educators--transform urban school systems?

Commentary
5.16.2001

Great City Schools

The Council of the Great City Schools deserves plaudits for its ever-greater willingness to speak candidly about educational achievement (as well as its vigorous efforts to boost that achievement).

Report
1.1.2001
Governance, Teachers & School Leaders

Professionalism and the Public Good: A Brief History of Teacher Certification

Jeffrey Mirel, David L. Angus

Why does our system of teacher certification emphasize training in pedagogy rather than subject-matter knowledge? The answer can be found in this report, which traces the emergence of state control over teacher certification. The focus is on efforts by the teacher education establishment to gain monopoly control over the licensing of teachers.

Pagination

  • First page « First
  • Previous page ‹ Previous
  • Page 3
  • Page 4
  • Page 5
  • Page 6
  • Page 7
  • Page 8
  • Page 9
  • Page 10
  • Current page 11

Type

  • Commentary (311)
  • Report (8)

Topics

  • Charter Schools (2)
  • Governance (6)
  • School Finance (2)
  • Teachers & School Leaders (2)

Date

  • (-) 2001 (0)
  • September 2001 (40)
  • October 2001 (57)
  • November 2001 (33)
  • May 2001 (37)
  • June 2001 (36)
  • July 2001 (45)
  • January 2001 (1)
  • December 2001 (31)
  • August 2001 (50)
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]