Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

When Schools Stay Open Late: The National Evaluation of the 21st-Century Community Learning Centers Program, First Year Findings

Eric Osberg
2.12.2003

U.S. Department of Education, Office of the Under Secretary
Prepared by Mathematica Policy Research, Inc. and Decision Information Resources, Inc.
February 2003

The Department of Education commissioned this report - the first of a trio over the next few years - to evaluate the 21st Century Learning Centers program, the primary source of federal dollars for after-school programs in 7,500 schools across the country. It examines a sample of these programs in their second and third years after the federal initiative refocused on academics in 1998. Given the size of the program - it received a $1 billion appropriation in 2002 - it's certainly worth asking whether or not it's working. So far, the results are discouraging. The test scores of participants are no better than those of similar non-participants, with a few exceptions. (Black and Hispanic middle school students did benefit slightly from the program, for example). Perhaps more surprising, student behavior, such as drug-use and study habits, did not improve and, in some areas, actually worsened. For example, participants were more likely to have tried marijuana and to sell drugs. Critics of this study will contend that an examination of a single year is not sufficient and that student behavior is difficult to measure, which may be true. Still, it's important to evaluate these initiatives and it's crucial to figure out what works and what doesn't in after-school services. Meanwhile, the Bush administration has proposed a big ($400 million) reduction in the program's 2004 budget. To read this important piece of research for yourself, visit http://www.ed.gov/pubs/21cent/firstyear/.

Tags: Mathematica United States Department of Education

Eric Osberg is the Director of Finance and Operations at the in Bethesda, Maryland, a Catholic, independent college preparatory school for girls, serving students from Pre-K–12.

From 2002 to 2010, Osberg served as the Vice President and Treasurer of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute and was also a Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution. He was primarily responsible for financial and managerial issues at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]