Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

What price victory for NCLB?

8.6.2003

In June, Gadfly voiced some skepticism when the Department of Education announced with great fanfare that it had approved the NCLB accountability plans of all fifty states, as well as the District of Columbia, and Puerto Rico. We noted that the "victory" was at best pyrrhic, since many states cut corners to comply and at least one (Iowa) was approved despite lacking state standards. [See http://www.edexcellence.net/gadfly/issue.cfm?issue=2#57.] Well, we now learn that the Education Department has sent follow-up letters to numerous states detailing what they must do for their accountability plans to be "fully approved." In fact, only five state plans were fully approved as of July 1. In addition, some states that thought they were in compliance have had Title I money withheld because of continued problems with their plans. Minnesota, for example, was denied $113,000 because the feds declined to honor a March 2002 waiver that would have allowed the state to use attendance and graduation rates for middle and high schools to determine whether they were making adequate yearly progress. The bottom line is that, before anyone can declare victory, more work awaits.

"'Approved' is relative term for ed. department," by Lynn Olson, Education Week, August 6, 2003

"Minnesota schools: Feds yank $113,000 from state coffers," by John Welbes, Pioneer Press, August 2, 2003

Tags: Iowa Minnesota No Child Left Behind Act Puerto Rico United States Department of Education Washington
+1 More Show Less
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]