Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Vouchers and the court, part II

5.21.2003

Last year, in Zelman v. Simmons-Harris, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that public money could cover tuition costs for children at private schools. Now, the Court is being asked to rule on whether tax dollars can cover scholarships, textbooks, and other types of aid for the study of religion in higher ed institutions. At stake is Washington state's "Promise Scholarships," which cover tuition and other costs for low-income, high-achieving high school graduates at Washington universities. Joshua Davey qualified for one, but was denied when he decided to study pastoral ministries at a religious college. State officials said that Washington law forbids public aid to religious schools, basing their decision on the state's "Blaine Amendment," one of a series passed in the late 19th century to force Catholic children into largely Protestant public schools. The setting for this case is college, but the ruling will have far-reaching implications for K-12 education, since Colorado's Blaine Amendment has already been invoked in a suit challenging their new voucher law and the outcome of that suit may determine whether other Blaine states will be able to pursue voucher programs. [For more on Colorado's program, go to http://www.edexcellence.net/gadfly/issue.cfm?issue=17#226.]

"Justices again asked to draw church-state line," by David G. Savage, Los Angeles Times, May 19, 2003

"Rights coalition files suit over Colorado vouchers law," by Michael A. Fletcher, The Washington Post, May 21, 2003

Tags: Blaine Amendment Colorado
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]