Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Using R for Estimating Longitudinal Student Achievement Models

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
3.3.2004

J.R. Lockwood, Harold Doran, and Daniel McCaffrey
R Foundation for Statistical Computing
December 2003

Interested in value-added models for gauging student achievement? Ready to digest something highly technical? J.R. Lockwood, Harold Doran, and Daniel F. McCaffrey have a challenging treat for you, a 7-page article in R News (published by the R Foundation for Statistical Computing) that explains, Doran says, how "all of the most common value added models...can be fit using a particular software package called R." The models "range from the most simple to the most complex, the [Tennessee value-added] system. . . . This article differs from others in that 'it shows how to' rather than describing what they are 'in theory' or what benefits they present." I'm not competent to validate (or refute) this assertion but perhaps you or a colleague can meet that challenge. Given the widespread view (everywhere except in the No Child Left Behind act) that value-added analyses are the fairest way to gauge student progress and school (and teacher) effectiveness, all contributions to their development are welcome. Find this one at http://cran.r-project.org/doc/Rnews/Rnews_2003-3.pdf.

Tags: No Child Left Behind Act

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]