Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Three Paths, One Destination: Standards-Based Reform in Maryland, Massachusetts and Texas

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
11.20.2002

Achieve, Inc.
November 2002

Achieve, Inc., the CEO-and-governor led standards-based reform organization, recently issued this 25-page account of reform progress by three of its favorite states (all of which had invited Achieve to review their work in this area.) The conclusion: after a decade or more of effort, standards-based reform is showing good results in all three but they're going about it very differently. "While the states used the same three-part strategy [standards, testing, accountability], the tactics they chose varied a great deal. Each state faced a unique set of circumstances and made different choices along the way. The different paths&suggest that there is more than one way to achieve high standards." For example, Massachusetts has focused entirely on "student stakes" while Maryland laid the accountability burden on schools, and Texas did both. Other differences are interesting, too, as is the ubiquity in all three states of "consistency, consensus and comprehensiveness." This report is a little on the boosterish side, perhaps not giving quite enough ink to stumbles and obstacles that these states encountered along the path, but, then, it was meant to encourage other states. One can only hope that NCLB's valiant effort to standardize many aspects of states' approach to standards-based reform will still permit this kind of constructive variation in more places. See for yourself at http://www.achieve.org/dstore.nsf/Lookup/reportthree-statefinal/$file/reportthree-statefinal.pdf.

Tags: Maryland Massachusetts No Child Left Behind Act Texas

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]