Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

A threat?

1.24.2011

Checker is not wrong to be concerned about China (although I think his worries over the test scores of students in Shanghai are overblown). Indeed, Robert Samuelson, writing in today's Washington Post, also believes the United States is too breezily naive, too undemanding in its approach to the communist behemoth. He and Checker are partly right: feting a dictator, Hu Jintao, in such an obsequious manner as the U.S did, gleefully welcoming the representative of a nation that acts, immorally or otherwise, purely to advance its self-interest, is inappropriate. But is China a threat? Perhaps. But perhaps a country of thieves, a parasitic state that produces only what it steals, or what it bribes other nations to give it; where creativity is not only not encouraged but actively discouraged; for which the concept of individuality let alone human rights hardly exists; for which appearances are more important than substance; whose leadership coddles savage despots while it robs their nations' of resources and wealth; whose massive population cannot forever be placated by double-digit economic growth?perhaps such a place, promoting such an uninspiring and unsustainable philosophy, is not so serious a threat as so many suppose?

?Liam Julian, Bernard Lee Schwartz Policy Fellow

Tags: China Shanghai
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]