Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Teacher Training Programs: Activities Underway to Improve Teacher Training, but Information Collected To Assess Accountability Has Limitations

Allison Cole
10.17.2002

Statement of Cornelia M. Ashby
October 2002

In testimony before a House subcommittee, Cornelia Ashby, director of the General Accounting Office's (GAO) education division, said that teacher education programs are taking advantage of the Department of Education's broad definitions of "graduate" and "pass rate" to escape the accountability provisions of the 1998 Higher Education Act (HEA). According to Ashby, education schools in some states are reporting inflated pass rates of up to 100 percent on teacher licensure exams by not counting as "graduates" those students who had completed all required coursework but failed the subsequent exam. The GAO also looked at the ways in which institutions and states have creatively interpreted the terms "waiver" and "alternative route to certification." Overall, the GAO deemed the information collected and reported under HEA's accountability provisions of inaccurate and inadequate to assess the quality of teacher training programs and the qualifications of current teachers. The GAO was also asked to evaluate whether the Teacher Quality Enhancement grants awarded under Title II of the HEA have improved the quality of teaching. GAO found that most of these grants are being used to reform certification requirements, to provide professional development to current teachers, and to recruit new teachers to the profession, but that it's too soon to know whether these programs are having any positive effect on teacher quality. For more, see http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d03197t.pdf.

Tags: Government Accountability Office Higher Education Act of 1965 United States Department of Education
Allison Cole
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]