Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Students on high school: stupid, boring, waste

7.9.2003

It's hardly news to say that students complain about school being boring. But it ought to give us pause that such a wide and varied range of students report, contemptuously, that America's high schools are almost uniformly incapable of sparking their intellectual interest. For example, take this completely anecdotal but nonetheless fascinating article in Educational Horizons, produced by Pi Lambda Theta. The authors asked more than 70 students to keep journals about their experiences in school. The 52 students who brought back usable journals were uniformly displeased, and 50 of them had one complaint in common: uninterested teachers who refused to deviate from the textbook or enliven instruction with example, discussion, or outside materials. The two words these youths used most often to describe their education were "boring" and "stupid." Pretty standard adolescent fare, perhaps, but even academic high-flyers were disengaged, and the general tone of the responses is remarkable for its ferocity. Write the authors, "Even students who received mostly good marks said that they endured their classes to attain marks that would qualify them for particular colleges&. One college-bound student in an urban school wrote, 'Sitting on your a-- all day and doing nothing is a waste. I wouldn't come to school, even if someone paid me. Personally, I'd rather take out the trash than show up for first period.'"

"Disengagement and loathing in high school," by Lawrence A. Baines and Gregory Kent Stanley, Educational Horizons, Summer 2003

Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]