Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

States Try Harder, But Gaps Persist: High School Exit Exams 2005

8.31.2005

Center on Education Policy
August 2005

University professors and myriad employers across the nation have repeatedly voiced the same complaint - the majority of U.S. high school graduates lack the skills necessary to succeed in either the collegiate or professional world. High school exit examinations, instituted in large part to address this problem, are now a requirement in 26 states. In 19 of them, students must register a passing score to receive a diploma. In its fourth annual report dissecting exit examination trends in all but one of these states, the Center on Education Policy finds mostly depressing results. The percentage of students passing exit exams on their first try has stagnated, and large gaps persist between minority students, special education students, and English-language learners, and the rest of their classmates. To get greater traction, states are starting to invest both time and money to develop more support for students preparing for the exams. In some states, more dollars have been funneled to remediation programs for struggling students, and in others, curricula have been redefined so higher-level material is introduced in earlier grades. Unfortunately, not all reforms reflect this sound approach, and some seem regressive. Arizona, for example, has instituted the self-defeating practice of using a student's good grades to make up for his or her low exit exam scores. (If grades represented meaningful standards, we wouldn't need statewide exams.) Other states have simply downgraded their exit exam passing requirements altogether. Will the recent efforts of the nation's governors to make high school more rigorous lead to greater progress in time for next year's report? Stand by. Meanwhile, you can find this year's here.

Tags: Arizona English
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]