Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

School Violence and No Child Left Behind: Best Practices to Keep Kids Safe

Eric Osberg
2.2.2005

Lisa Snell, Reason Foundation
January 2005

This short but useful report exposes yet another game states play to avoid the spirit of No Child Left Behind: finding ways to label few or none of their schools as "persistently dangerous" - partly because students are supposed to be given exit visas from such schools. In 2003-2004, if you believe these state reports, only 52 schools in America were dangerous, including none in New York City or California, not even the schools where "three male students . . . forced a girl into a closet and sexually assaulted her," or "a student . . . smashed his ex-girlfriend's head through a trophy case." (Click here for more.) Though this report won't solve this particular NCLB problem, other than perhaps to shame the least honest states, it does offer a number of suggestions to reduce violence in schools - the point, after all, of this provision. A starting point is to create incentives for schools to reduce crime. If better data were available to parents about crime at each school, and if parents were able to exercise real choice among schools, market forces would focus schools' attention on this problem. For school leaders already focused, Snell suggests the "broken windows" approach that has been credited with reducing ordinary crime in New York City: promptly address the little things that go wrong so as to create an environment less conducive to more serious crimes. There's no proof yet that this works in schools, but it could hardly be worse than the usual approach, which is to adopt every crime prevention fad or violence-reduction nostrum and add massive amounts of security. Snell also argues for smaller schools, which are usually less violent. Of course the data are muddied by the number of small private and parochial schools, but the results seem to hold even after controlling for factors like poverty. Whichever strategy is chosen, we owe it to our children to reduce the 5.4 percent of students who skipped school for safety concerns and the 9 percent who were threatened or injured by a weapon in school in 2003. This accessible and useful report is available online at www.rppi.org/ps330.pdf.

Tags: California New York No Child Left Behind Act Reason Foundation

Eric Osberg is the Director of Finance and Operations at the in Bethesda, Maryland, a Catholic, independent college preparatory school for girls, serving students from Pre-K–12.

From 2002 to 2010, Osberg served as the Vice President and Treasurer of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute and was also a Research Fellow at the Hoover Institution. He was primarily responsible for financial and managerial issues at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]