Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

School Facilities for Children, Not Districts

Terry Ryan Quentin Suffren
7.11.2006


Charter schools in Ohio struggle to find the resources necessary to build new facilities or expand existing ones. This is not just an Ohio problem, though. Across the nation, tales abound of charter school leaders maxing out credit cards and borrowing against their homes to house students. Meanwhile, traditional districts are spending millions in state dollars to renovate existing facilities and construct new ones-often despite deeply pessimistic enrollment forecasts.

This makes little sense for communities or taxpayers. Ohio needs to fund the schools children attend rather than the construction of new buildings in the hope that students will fill them.

One solution is to encourage school districts to "sponsor" free and independent charter schools, making these schools eligible for state facilities funding, so long as the following conditions are met:

  • Such schools must be "true" charters--i.e., non-profit organizations with their own boards that enter into contracts with districts and have the right to end those contracts and/or seek new sponsors.
  • Districts counting charter school students for purposes of construction/renovation funding must make suitable facilities available to those schools at no cost to them.
  • Districts must agree that, if such a charter school opts to change sponsors, it can continue to lease its facility from the district for (at least) 10-15 years at prevailing market rates. (This provision keeps the charter school from being held hostage by the district or from being closed down should political winds shift on the district school board.)

Ohio needs a viable strategy to provide all public schools the facilities they need.
 

"School Board Argues Over Cuts," by Jennifer Mrozowski, The Cincinnati Enquirer, July 11, 2006.

"Fewer New Schools Needed," by Jennifer Mrozowski, The Cincinnati Enquirer, July 6, 2006.

"Investors to the Rescue," Editorial, The Wall Street Journal, June 30, 2006.

"Despite Hopes, New City Schools Will Serve Fewer Neighborhoods," by Scott Elliot, The Dayton Daily News, June 29, 2006.

"Dayton Forced to Cut Back School Building Plan," by Scott Elliot, The Dayton Daily News, June 29, 2006.

Tags: Board of education Dayton Ohio

Terry Ryan was Vice-President for Ohio Programs and Policy at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, and a Research Fellow at the Hoover Research Institution.

He is the author, with Chester E. Finn, Jr. and Michael Lafferty of Ohio’s Education Reform Challenges: Lessons from the Frontlines (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).

Quentin Suffren is chief academic officer at The Learning Institute (TLI) in Hot Springs, Arkansas. TLI provides assessment, data and curriculum services to 80 school districts (educating over 250,000 students) in Arkansas and Louisiana. At TLI, Quentin leads the curriculum and professional development teams that directly support school administrators, program coordinators and classroom teachers. Before assuming this role…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]