Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

In response to "The Special Ed Burden," guest editorial by Jay Greene in last week's Gadfly.

5.15.2002
Mr. Greene:

Superb analysis. I had never considered that full funding of special education costs by the federal government would dramatically increase public schools' incentive to classify challenging children. The recommendation to "voucherize" classified children would certainly reduce the incentive for misidentification.

As to the causes for high numbers of "learning disability" classifications, all the possibilities you mention probably play a role. My best guess--after 28 years as a learning disabilities teacher (retired two years)--as to the major culprit, however, is weak reading instruction (whole language philosophy) for at-risk children in the first two grades.

I can't say with certainty, however, that early reading instruction is worse today that 30 years ago. Only in the past decade did I begin teaching children as young 3rd graders. I can say that K-2 reading instruction, as I witnessed it, is weak today for at-risk children because of the lack of systematic, sequential phonics in the early grades. But I doubt if it was ever strong in the past half century.

Tom Shuford
Special Education Teacher, 3rd and 4th grades, 28 years, Retired
Ventura, CA

Tags: California
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]