Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

The Quantum Opportunity Program Demonstration: Implementation and Short-Term Impacts

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
10.15.2003

Myles Mayfield, Allen Schirm, and Ruria Rodriguez-Planas, Mathematica Policy Research August 2003


Myles Maxfield and two colleagues at Mathematica Policy Research (MPR) authored this 24-page evaluation of a six-year, seven site, after-school demonstration program for 600 high-risk high-school age youth, underwritten by the Labor Department and Ford Foundation. Surveys of participating youths and a matched control group sought to determine the program's effects on high school performance and graduation, postsecondary ed, and "risky behaviors." Evaluators also looked at how well the various sites implemented the program model. The findings are mixed. Implementation (particularly of education components such as tutoring) was spotty. Participation rates were low. Per-participant costs were high. Impacts varied hugely from site to site. "Risky behaviors" may have worsened for participants in several sites. Grades and achievement test scores did not improve. On the other hand, high-school graduation prospects brightened a bit (7 percent), as did the likelihood of engaging in post-high school education or training. Longer-term impacts have yet to be evaluated. What is to be concluded at this stage? It's mighty hard to mount successful interventions at the high school level for young people whose lives have already gone off-track. If you'd like to see for yourself, surf to http://wdr.doleta.gov/owsdrr/papers/QOP_synthesis.pdf.

Tags: Mathematica United States Department of Labor

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]