Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program
Flypaper

The President's budget request: More pro than con

Michael J. Petrilli
2.1.2010

Today is budget day; all of Washington is abuzz. The U.S. Department of Education's budget details are here. What to make of them?

I hate to disappoint readers who enjoy a real slashing of the Administration, but the budget is pretty good. Very good, actually.

  • ??? There's more??money for charter schools, for example, and in a manner that will allow dollars to flow to authorizers* and networks of schools, not just individual school start-ups.
  • ??? There's LOTS more money for innovative pay programs for teachers and principals, including merit pay.
  • ??? And big formula funds are either level-funded (including Title I) or reduced (including the Teacher Quality State Grant, which would take a $500 million hit). That's smart because additional dollars in those formula programs don't make a bit of difference in terms of driving reform, while well-designed competitive programs can leverage a lot of change.

To be sure, I'm not gaga over all of it. The new money for Race to the Top is surely premature, and I agree with Andy that additional funds for school turnarounds will mostly be wasted. But still, let's be honest: this is an education budget that a Whole Foods Republican could love.

* Our sister organization, the Thomas B. Fordham Foundation, authorizes schools in Ohio. Though, for the record, I'd be strongly opposed to taking federal money, even for this worthy enterprise!

-Mike Petrilli

Tags: Ohio Republican Party United States Department of Education

President, Thomas B. Fordham Institute

Michael J. PetrilliĀ is president of the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, executive editor of Education Next, editor in chief of the Education Gadfly Weekly, host of the…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]