Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Outcomes of Learning: Results from the 2000 Program for International Student Assessment of 15-Year-Olds in Reading, Mathematics and Science Literacy

Terry Ryan
12.5.2001

National Center for Education Statistics, December 2001

American 15-year-olds are about average compared with their peers in other advanced countries when it comes to their ability to apply reading, math and science skills to real-life situations. This according to the new Program for International Student Assessment (PISA), the results of which were released this week. In both math literacy and science literacy, U.S. students scored well below their counterparts in countries such as Japan, Korea and Finland. In reading literacy, Finland, Canada and New Zealand led the pack. For this project, the United States joined with 27 other member countries of the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) and four non-OECD countries to devise a survey that was given to 265,000 students in 32 lands.  Unlike other international education appraisals, this one focuses on students' knowledge and skills in the context of everyday situations rather than their curricular mastery.  The PISA results are in line with other international studies that show American students to be average in their understanding of math and science.  According to the OECD's deputy director for education Barry McGaw, the explanation is that many young Americans score very badly; what the U.S. needs to do, he says, is pull up the bottom.  In countries like Finland, Japan, and South Korea there is a much narrower gap between the highest and lowest performers than is in the United States. For those American students who scored well, one explanatory factor seems to be access to teachers with university degrees in the subjects they're teaching. You can access the report - a print version of which is forthcoming - online at http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2002115.

Tags: Canada Finland Japan National Center for Education Statistics Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development Programme for International Student Assessment Reading South Korea
+3 More Show Less

Terry Ryan was Vice-President for Ohio Programs and Policy at the Thomas B. Fordham Institute, and a Research Fellow at the Hoover Research Institution.

He is the author, with Chester E. Finn, Jr. and Michael Lafferty of Ohio’s Education Reform Challenges: Lessons from the Frontlines (Palgrave Macmillan, 2010).

Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]