Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

No Child Left Behind Act: Education Needs to Provide Additional Technical Assistance and Conduct Implementation Studies for School Choice Provision

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
1.19.2005

United States Government Accountability Office
December 2004

Once again we learn that the public-school choice feature of NCLB isn't working well. This 55-page GAO report appraises the first two years of its implementation and finds it sorely lacking. Though ten percent of Title I schools (about 5 percent of all public schools) "have been identified for school choice," only one percent of eligible students actually transferred. The reasons are myriad and diverse, according to GAO's close examination of eight districts. The biggest are "tight timelines and insufficient classroom capacity." The Education Department's monitoring and guidance, though extensive, are not adequate, either. By and large, the Department concurs with the GAO recommendations, which include better data, better studies, yet more guidance, and various forms of public/parent information and technical assistance to states and districts. In this report, however, nobody goes to what may be the heart of the problem, namely the law itself, with its cramped view of choice and severe limits on the options that must be afforded to children stuck in bad schools. See for yourself at http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d057.pdf.

"NCLB's transfer provisions stymied, GAO report says," by Caroline Hendrie, Education Week, January 5, 2005

Tags: Government Accountability Office No Child Left Behind Act

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]