Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

New York Times smears No Child Left Behind

4.16.2003

Checker was right to skewer Michael Winerip for his grouchy piece, "A Pervasive Dismay On a Bush School Law," [see "The Law People Love to Hate - and Pretend to Love," http://www.edexcellence.net/gadfly/issue.cfm?issue=16#242It is always annoying when reporters proclaim that grumblings are the manifestation of a zeitgeist (it's also scientifically bogus).

However, I was surprised that Checker didn't bean Winerip for his gross misrepresentation of the accountability provisions of Title I of the No Child Left Behind Act. Winerip wrote "How do you defend a law that is likely to result in 85 percent of public schools in America being labeled failing based on a single test score?"

This statement is incorrect on four counts. First, the No Child Left Behind Act only mandates state testing for elementary and middle schools. This leaves out high schools. So Winerip's "85 percent of public schools" is misleading.

Second, this 85 percent figure is unsubstantiated. It seems he took an estimate given to him by one of the grouchy Vermont officials he interviewed and generalized it for the nation. The truth is, we simply do not know how many schools failed to make AYP yet. I've seen no studies that offer a figure.

Third, NCLB doesn't label any schools as "failing." If a school fails to show adequate yearly progress (AYP) in either math or English for two years, the school will fall into "school improvement status." If the school does not make AYP for three straight years, it then falls into "corrective action status." [See http://www.ed.gov/legislation/ESEA02/pg2.html#sec1111] Yes, this sounds like semantic quibbling but, after all, the Times is supposed to be the newspaper of record.

Finally, schools do not fall into "improvement" status based on "a single test score." Again, students must fail to make AYP for two years (that implies two tests at minimum). Moreover, AYP is calculated based on a number of factors, not just test scores.

Perhaps the Department of Education representatives that Winerip wrote about would face less flack if Winerip and other reporters more accurately reported the facts of the law to the public!

Kevin R. Kosar
Lecturer in Public Administration
Robert F. Wagner Graduate School of Public Service
New York University

Tags: English Michael Winerip No Child Left Behind Act United States Department of Education Vermont
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]