Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

New Teacher Mentoring: Hopes and Promise for Improving Teacher Effectiveness

12.22.2011

Ellen Moir, Dara Barlin, Janet Gless, and Jan Miles, New Teacher Center
Harvard Education Press
2009

This volume is the work of the New Teacher Center (NTC) at UC-Santa Cruz, a comprehensive teacher mentoring and professional development outfit. You may recall that the federal Institute of Education Sciences used NTC’s program as one of the two “comprehensive” treatments in its Comprehensive Teacher Induction study (find year one and year two results here; year three is underway). To date, that study has found meager effectiveness gains from teacher induction and mentoring programs. Undaunted, NTC insists that, through instructionally-intensive, high-quality mentor training, districts can ensure higher teacher retention rates and improve instructional quality. Here they describe how their program has been implemented in four cities: Durham, Boston, New York City, and Chicago. Looks encouraging for teacher retention at least, but this is not a statistical analysis. There is no control for other changes underway in those districts or any proof of causality. On balance, this book describes an appealing program but fails to rebut the IES findings. You can purchase it here.

Tags: Boston Chicago Harvard Education Press Institute of Education Sciences New York
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]