Skip to main content

Mobile Navigation

  • National
    • Policy
      • High Expectations
      • Quality Choices
      • Personalized Pathways
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Gadfly Newsletter
      • Flypaper Blog
    • Events
    • Scholars Program
  • Ohio
    • Policy
      • Priorities
      • Media & Testimony
    • Research
    • Commentary
      • Ohio Education Gadfly Biweekly
      • Ohio Gadfly Daily
  • Charter Authorizing
    • Application
    • Sponsored Schools
    • Resources
  • About
    • Mission
    • Board
    • Staff
    • Career
Home
Home
Advancing Educational Excellence

Main Navigation

  • National
  • Ohio
  • Charter Authorizing
  • About

National Menu

  • Topics
    • Accountability & Testing
    • Advanced Education
    • Career & Technical Education
    • Charter Schools
    • Curriculum & Instruction
    • ESSA
    • Evidence-Based Learning
    • Facilities
    • Governance
    • Personalized Learning
    • Private School Choice
    • School Finance
    • Standards
    • Teachers & School Leaders
    • Think Again
  • Research
  • Commentary
    • Gadfly Newsletter
    • Flypaper Blog
    • Gadfly Podcast
  • Events
  • Scholars Program

Model Contractor Standards & State Responsibilities for State Testing Standards

Chester E. Finn, Jr.
7.10.2002

S.E. Phillips and Theodor Rebarber, AccountabilityWorks and the Education Leaders Council
June 2002

Another joint report by AccountabilityWorks and the Education Leaders Council, this 25-pager by S.E. Phillips and Theodor Rebarber provides a useful if somewhat technical guide to the relationship between a state and its testing contractor, including numerous responsibilities and expectations needing to be fulfilled by each side if the state testing program is to work well. It offers a rigorous, comprehensive and clear-headed set of guidelines and, while it's most apt to be of interest to state-level policymakers (and testing companies), if its advice were taken seriously it could prevent a lot of mistakes, confusions, ambiguities, recriminations, delays, false starts and wasted dollars. As state testing burdens mount under the pressure of No Child Left Behind (and as the overworked testing industry gets cocky or sloppy, well aware that there's no shortage of jobs and revenues waiting in the corridor), these specifications could prove very helpful. You can find it in PDF format at http://www.educationleaders.org/elc/events/model%20contractor.pdf.

Chester E. Finn, Jr., scholar, educator and public servant, has devoted his career to improving education in the United States. At Fordham, he is now Distinguished Senior Fellow and President Emeritus. He’s also a Volker Senior Fellow at…

View Full Bio
Fordham Logo

© 2026 The Thomas B. Fordham Institute
Privacy Policy
Usage Agreement

National

P.O. Box 110
Burke, VA 22009

202.223.5452

[email protected]

Ohio

P.O. Box 82291
Columbus, OH 43202

614.223.1580

[email protected]

Sponsorship

130 West Second Street, Suite 410
Dayton, Ohio 45402

937.227.3368

[email protected]